MHB How to Solve Vector Equations and Find Distances in Analytic Geometry?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the vector equations provided, the equation of the plane containing line s and parallel to line r can be expressed using their direction vectors. The distance from point P0 to line s can be determined by minimizing the distance function derived from the coordinates of line s. For finding the distance between lines r and s, the perpendicular distance from a point on line r to the plane defined in part a is calculated. Lastly, to find points P in line r and Q in line s such that the distance between them equals the distance between the two lines, the vector PQ must be perpendicular to both lines, leading to a system of equations to solve for parameters λ and t. Understanding these concepts and calculations is essential for tackling analytic geometry problems involving vector equations.
Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to help a friend but I don't remember any of this, so it'd help us both. Book recommendations are also welcomed.

Given the vector equations $$r: \begin{cases} x = 2 - \lambda, \\ y = 1 + 3 \lambda, \\ z = 1 + \lambda, \end{cases} \text{ and } s: \begin{cases} x = 1+t, \\ y = 3+4t, \\ z = 1 + 3t, \end{cases}$$

find:

[a] the equation of the plane that contains the line $s$ and it's parallel to $r$;
the distance of the point $P_0 = (2,0,0)$ to the line $s$;
[c] the distance between the lines $r$ and $s$;
[d] a point $P$ in $r$ and a point $Q$ in $s$ such that the distance between $P$ and $Q$ be equal to the distance between $r$ and $s$.

Don't necessarily need the full solution (although it'd be appreciated), hints and tips on the train of thought will be hugely valuable.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
I'm trying to help a friend but I don't remember any of this, so it'd help us both. Book recommendations are also welcomed.

Given the vector equations $$r: \begin{cases} x = 2 - \lambda, \\ y = 1 + 3 \lambda, \\ z = 1 + \lambda, \end{cases} \text{ and } s: \begin{cases} x = 1+t, \\ y = 3+4t, \\ z = 1 + 3t, \end{cases}$$

find:

[a] the equation of the plane that contains the line $s$ and it's parallel to $r$;
the distance of the point $P_0 = (2,0,0)$ to the line $s$;
[c] the distance between the lines $r$ and $s$;
[d] a point $P$ in $r$ and a point $Q$ in $s$ such that the distance between $P$ and $Q$ be equal to the distance between $r$ and $s$.

Don't necessarily need the full solution (although it'd be appreciated), hints and tips on the train of thought will be hugely valuable.


to a)

The equation of the plane must contain the line s completely and the direction vector of r:

$\displaystyle{\langle x,y,z \rangle = \langle 1,3,1 \rangle + t \cdot \langle 1,4,3 \rangle + \lambda \cdot \langle -1,3,1 \rangle}$

That's all.

to b)

Determine the minimum of the distance from $P_0$ to any point of the straight line:

$Q \in s$. Then the distance is:

$d = |\overrightarrow{P_0,Q}| = |\vec q - \overrightarrow{p_0}|$

That means:

$d(t) = \sqrt{(-1+t)^2+(3+4t)^2+(1+3t)^2} = \sqrt{11+28t+26t^2}$

Now differentiate d, solve the equation d'(t) = 0 for t. Plug in this value into the equation of the straight line. You'll get the point Q whose distance to P is at it's minimum. Calculate the distance $\overline{P_0,Q}$.

to c)

Calculate the perpendicular distance of M(2, 1, 1) to the plane of part a). (Why?)

to d)

$\overrightarrow{PQ}$ must be perpendicular to both lines that means:

$\overrightarrow{PQ} \cdot \langle 1,4,3 \rangle = 0 ~\wedge~ \overrightarrow{PQ} \cdot \langle -1,3,1\rangle = 0$

Solve for $\lambda$ and $t$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top