Analyzing a Complex Integral: Circle of Radius 2 Centered at 0 Counterclockwise

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int\limits_C\frac{\mbox{d}z}{z}\) over a circle of radius 2 centered at 0, oriented counterclockwise, evaluates to \(2\pi i\). The parameterization used is \(\gamma=2\cos t+2i\sin t\) with \(\gamma'=-2\sin t+2i\cos t\) for \(t\in[0,2\pi]\). An alternative parameterization is \(z=2e^{i\theta}\). The term "counterclockwise" refers to the orientation of the path taken around the circle, moving opposite to the direction of clock hands.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of contour integrals
  • Parameterization of curves in the complex plane
  • Knowledge of Euler's formula \(e^{i\theta}\)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study contour integration techniques in complex analysis
  • Learn about the residue theorem and its applications
  • Explore different parameterizations of curves in the complex plane
  • Investigate the implications of orientation in contour integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians working with integrals, and anyone interested in understanding contour integration and its applications in complex functions.

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


integral: \int\limits_C\frac{\mbox{d}z}{z} where C is circle of radius 2 centered at 0 oriented counterclockwise

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I am going to parameter this: \gamma=2\cos t+2i\sin t,\ \gamma^\prime=-2\sin t+2i\cos t,\ t\in[0,2\pi], then z=x+iy=2\cos t+2i\sin t and integral will look like this:
\int\limits^{2\pi}_0\frac{-2\sin t+2i\cos t}{2\cos t+2i\sin t}\mbox{d}t=\int\limits^{2\pi}_0\frac{i\left(i\cos t-\sin t\right)}{i\cos t-\sin t}\mbox{d}t=2\pi i
is it correct? and another question, what is counterclockwise? thanks for answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Counter Clockwise" (called by our British cousins "anti-clockwise") means going around a circle opposite to the way clock hands do. On a coordinate system, going around the circle with radius 2 from (2, 0) to (0, 2) to (-2, 0) to (0, -2) back to (2, 0).

Yes, what you have done is correct. You could also use the parameterization z= 2e^{i\theta}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oh, sure, thanks for answer;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K