Analyzing a Particle in a Non-Homogeneous Differential Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing the motion of a particle in a potential described by U(x) = a/x^2, leading to a differential equation derived from Newton's second law. Participants are exploring the nature of the differential equation and the appropriate methods for solving it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to classify the differential equation and considers it as a non-homogeneous constant-coefficient ODE. They express uncertainty about the method to use, particularly regarding the term 1/x^2. Other participants question the initial setup of the relationship between force and potential energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct relationship between force and potential energy, indicating a productive direction for the original poster to reconsider their method.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses doubt about their approach and the complexity of the integrals involved, highlighting the challenges faced in solving the problem. There is an indication of confusion regarding the definitions and relationships in the context of conservative forces.

SandraH
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement







We're required to analyse a particle moving in the potential U(x) = a/x^2 (a > 0). Setting F = U(x) and using the Newton equation F = ma, this gives rise to the DE:



d2x = a/m * (1/x^2)

dt^2



I can't for the life of me figure out what method to use or even what sort of DE this is! That 1/x^2 is blowing my mind.







Any clues would really help.


The Attempt at a Solution




I've tried treating this as a non-homogeneous constant-coefficient ODE of the form



ax'' + bx' + cx = f(t)



(setting f(t) = 1/ x(t)^2 )



I try to solve



d2x = x(t)^-2

dt^2



Ignoring constants for now.



Complementary solution (solution to the complementary equation:
ax"(t) + bx'(t) + cx(t) + d = 0)



-> x_c = at + b



Particular solution



-> xp = x(t)^-2 + x(t)^-1 + x(t) + c1 ?



Next I find the derivatives of the particular solution





x'p = -2x(t)^-3 * x'(t) -x(t)^-2 * x'(t) + x'(t)



And using the chain rule:



x''p = [ -2x(t)^-3 * x''(t) + x'(t) * 6 x(t)^-3 * x'(t)] + [-x(t)^-2 * x''(t) + x'(t)* 2x(t)^-3 * x'(t)] + x''(t)



At this point (right before finding constants) I seriously begin to doubt whether this is the method to use. Any hints?









I also tried using the modified Newton equation (t - t0 = +/- sqrt(m/2) int[1/sqrt(E-U(y)] dy... it's called 'reduction to quadrature') which yielded a very hard integral I couldn't do by substitution or parts



int ((E - a/y^2)^-1/2 ) dy



I'm yet to try partial fractions, but I seriously doubt whether that would work...



Thanks!



Sandra
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Sandra,

Thanks for posting such a complete post detailing your efforts, it's refreshing change from students who just expect us to do their homework for them! Your problem is right at the beginning of your solution:
SandraH said:
We're required to analyse a particle moving in the potential U(x) = a/x^2 (a > 0). Setting F = U(x)
This is incorrect, the relationship between a conservative force F and the potential U is,

[tex]\underline{F} = -\nabla U[/tex]

Which in one dimension simplifies to,

[tex]F = -\frac{d}{dx}U[/tex]
 
ahaaa a problem right at the beginning. I feel sheepish..
Thanks Hootenanny
 
SandraH said:
ahaaa a problem right at the beginning. I feel sheepish..
Thanks Hootenanny
Your welcome :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K