Analyzing Acceleration Components in a Horizontal Projectile Trajectory

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJadhav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest F=ma
AI Thread Summary
A point-like object is thrown horizontally from a 50-meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s, and the problem involves analyzing its acceleration components during the trajectory. The only force acting on the object is gravity, resulting in a downward acceleration vector. The discussion highlights confusion about how to mathematically express the tangential and perpendicular components of acceleration, particularly in relation to the object's trajectory. It is concluded that the tangential component of acceleration becomes twice the perpendicular component after 2.00 seconds. Participants suggest using kinematics and vector analysis to approach the problem effectively.
AJadhav
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AJadhav said:

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.



ok now that I read it further its not quite as I posted.
hmmmm...
 
Last edited:
AJadhav said:

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.

Assuming gravity is the only force acting on the point you could split up the acceleration due to g into two components relative to the current "path". The angle of the velocity vector that would give you this ratio could be found. And then you could find the time at which the point would be headed in this direction/angle. looks like the velocity vector would be headed at a 27.5 degree or 63.5 degree angle with respect to the real vertical or horizontal. If I am reading this correctly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top