Analyzing Arc Equations - Why are x1,x2 & y1,y2 Half Circles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kishtik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc
kishtik
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
The first general circle formula is,
<br /> (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=r^2<br />
Where M(a,b) and r:radius.
I understand this well, but when the subject is arcs...
<br /> (x-a)^2=r^2-(y-b)^2<br />
<br /> x_\textrm{1,2} =a (+-) \sqrt{r^2-(y-b)^2}<br />
My teacher said that equations for x1 and x2 were half circles at right and left. But how?
And also the same fo y,
<br /> y_\textrm{1,2}=b(+-)\sqrt{r^2-(x-a)^2}<br />
were the arcs of top half and bottom of the circle. But why?
Any help is appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You apparently accept that (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=r^2
is the equation of a circle.

To get x_\textrm{1,2} =a (+-) \sqrt{r^2-(y-b)^2}, you solve for x. Of course, with the square root, you have to take + and - to get both roots.

You know, I hope, that x measures right and left on a graph. The point (4,3) is 4 units to the right of the x-axis. The point (-4,3) is 4 units to the left. When you solve any equation for x, the result is "left" or "right". Taking the positive sign is right, negative, left.

y measures up and down so solving for y does the same thing except up and down instead of right and left.
 
I knew that basics but couldn't put together. Thanks anyway.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Back
Top