Ancient Artifacts: Could They Prove Extraterrestrial Visitation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter old dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    iphone
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of burying modern items, such as an iPhone and steel tools, to analyze what might remain after 10,000 to 100,000 years. It raises questions about the potential evidence of past extraterrestrial visits to Earth, suggesting that if such visits occurred, more tangible artifacts would likely exist beyond mere artistic representations. The conversation touches on the durability of modern materials compared to ancient structures, considering factors like geological history and the tendency of conquering civilizations to destroy earlier monuments. The Fermi Paradox is also mentioned, questioning why advanced civilizations have not made contact, which aligns with the speculative nature of the discussion. The forum emphasizes a focus on mainstream STEM topics, suggesting that speculative discussions may be better suited for other platforms.
old dog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Not sure if I should post this question here or in the Materials & Chemical Engineering forum but I will give it a try.

If I were to take several modern items, let's say an iPhone, a set of chrome vanadium steel wrenches and a stainless steel/titanium Smith & Wesson revolver and bury them at a variety of places on Earth what would be found in 10,000, 50,000 or 100,000 years? Anything resembling items made by a technologically advanced culture?

The reason I am asking is this: If the Earth was visited by extraterrestrials in the remote past wouldn't there be something left more convincing than artistic renderings of bizarre creatures and "flying saucers"?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
It would depend on how many of the artifacts were left behind and what happened in the intervening time.

The topic is pretty borderline - there are bigger reasons to discount a von-Danikken-esque extraterrestrial hypothesis than the lack of artifacts - which can always be explained away as due to the ETs being tidy and taking the obvious stuff with them or that they are here and have been found, only the Gov'ment is covering it up.
Trouble is - we cannot talk about it here. Try the JREF.

You may try thinking on what you'd have to do to deliberately leave a monument of some kind that would survive something like 100 million years. Check out the recent geological history (100mil years is recent yeah) to see what sort of think it may have to contend with.
 
You can also look at known ancient artifacts and see how well they aged. The pyramids, Stone Henge and various Roman building structures vs the ruins of Troy and other lost cities. Conquering civilizations tend to destroy the mounments of an earlier age or vandalize them for the resources or treasures still left.

And then wonder how long one of our modern buildings would last if left to man or nature.

A related issue is the Fermi paradox and why SETI has heard nothing from some advanced civilization:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox

Again all of this is borderline as far as PF is concerned. Our primary mission here is to help students with mainstream STEM questions and as a result delving into speculative science confuses the issue for students so we tend to shut down threads that try to explore it and suggest they try other forums if they still want to pursue it.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top