MHB Andrew's question at Yahoo Answers regarding maximizing the area of a rectangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
AI Thread Summary
To maximize the area of a rectangle with one side on the x-axis and vertices on the curve y=4/(4+x^2), the area function is defined as A(x) = (8x)/(x^2+4). By differentiating A(x) and setting the derivative A'(x) to zero, the critical point found is x=2, indicating a relative maximum. The vertices of the rectangle at this maximum area are (-2, 1/2), (2, 1/2), (2, 0), and (-2, 0). This analysis confirms the optimal dimensions for the rectangle's area.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

A rectangle has one side on the x-axis and two vertices on the curve y=4/4+x^2?

Find the vertices of the rectangle with maximum area.
Vertices =
Enter your answers as a comma-separated list of ordered (x,y) pairs, e.g., (1,0),(8,0),(1,4),(8,4).

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Andrew,

The base of the rectangle will be $b=2x$ where $0\le x$ and the height of the rectangle will be $h=\dfrac{4}{4+x^2}$. Hence the area function is:

$$A(x)=2x\cdot\frac{4}{4+x^2}=\frac{8x}{x^2+4}$$

To find our critical values, we may differentiate this area function with respect to $x$ and equate the result to zero:

$$A'(x)=\frac{\left(x^2+4\right)(8)-(8x)(2x)}{\left(x^2+4\right)^2}=\frac{8(2+x)(2-x)}{\left(x^2+4\right)^2}=0$$

The non-negative critical value here is:

$$x=2$$

And we see that the derivative is positive to the left of this value and negative to the right, and so by the first derivative test we may conclude that this critical value is at a relative maximum.

Thus, our vertices are:

$$\bbox[5px,border:2px solid #207498]{\left(-2,\frac{1}{2}\right),\,\left(2,\frac{1}{2}\right),\,(2,0),\,(-2,0)}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top