Angle for Maximum Range in Projectile Motion with Drag Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving problem 3.8 from Kibble & Berkshire, specifically determining the angle for maximum range in projectile motion while considering drag. The user has successfully found the first-order approximation of the range but struggles with maximizing the angle. They express the range in terms of velocity and angle but encounter difficulties in deriving a cubic equation for sin(α) and achieving the correct numerical factors for cos(2α). The hint provided suggests using zeroth-order approximations for small angles, but the user finds this approach confusing and unproductive. Additional insights or methods to clarify the solution process are requested.
fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is Kibble & Berkshire 3.8, http://books.google.com/books?id=0a...kibble berkshire&pg=PA68#v=onepage&q&f=false" is a link. (The problem is on page 68. Equation 3.17, referred to in the problem, is on page 53.)

I figured out the first part (finding the first-order approximation of the range), but I'm having problems figuring out the angle for maximum range.

Edit: I originally said it was problem 3.7, but it's really problem 3.8 I'm having problems with. The link is still valid.

The Attempt at a Solution


The velocity is v^2 = u^2 + w^2 (see page 53). The angle we're looking for is \alpha = arctan(w/u).

It seems like one should be able to write the expression for x in terms of v, and find the extrema of that function. However it is impossible to write x solely in terms of v (and some constants). Also, I don't really understand the hint. Halp!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can certainly express u and w in terms of v and \alpha. You can then extremize x with respect to \alpha. As for the hint, if you keep all terms in \alpha, you arrive at a cubic equation for \sin\alpha, which is a bit unwieldy. However, any way that I try to use the hint, I'm always off by a numerical factor from their result for \cos 2\alpha. Maybe you'll have better luck.
 
Still stuck on this problem.

I can write, using the expression for x given in the link and the relation between u,v,w, and alpha

x = \frac{2}{g} v^2 \sin\alpha \cos\alpha - \frac{8 \gamma}{3 g^2} v^3 \cos\alpha \sin^2\alpha

Maximizing this function wrt. to v doesn't lead to the desired answer (I'm omit the details).

So I try to use the hint("in the term containing \gamma, you may use the zeroth-order approximation for the angle") Ok, so for \alpha small, the zeroth order approx. of cos(\alpha) is 1 and the zeroth-order approx. of sin^2(\alpha) is ... 0? This doesn't make sense. And clearly it leads nowhere.

Maybe I'm supposed to leave the sin^2 term alone. If I try that, I still don't get the desired answer.

Any insight into how to solve this problem is appreciated.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top