Angles between normals at 2 points on a surface

svishal03
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
I have been reading about the normal vector to a point on a surface.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalVector.html

Can anyone explain if I have normals to 2 points on a surface and I want to compute the inclinations between them, how would one proceed?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
svishal03 said:
I have been reading about the normal vector to a point on a surface.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalVector.html

Can anyone explain if I have normals to 2 points on a surface and I want to compute the inclinations between them, how would one proceed?

Hey svishal03.

What do you mean by inclinations? Do you mean the angle between them?
 
How you determine the angle between normals depends upon the way the surface is given. For example, if you are given f(x,y,z)= constant, the normals at (x_0, y_0, z_0) and (x_1, y_1, z_1) are given by \nabla f(x_0, y_0, z_0) and \nabla f(x_1, y_1, z_1). And, of course, the angle between those two vectors is given by their dot product: cos^{-1}(\vec{u}\cdot\vec{v}/|\vec{u}||\vec{v}|).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top