Angular acceleration of a merry-go-round - no time given?

AI Thread Summary
A merry-go-round accelerates uniformly from rest to a speed of 2.5 rpm over 5 revolutions, leading to a question about calculating angular acceleration without a given time. The conversion of 2.5 rpm to radians per second is noted as 0.262 rad/s. The angular acceleration formula requires both change in angular speed and time, but the time was initially misunderstood. The discussion reveals that using the equation of motion for rotation, specifically ω_f² = ω_i² + 2αθ, helps clarify the relationship between angular displacement and acceleration. Ultimately, the correct calculation of angular acceleration is confirmed to be 0.0011 rad/s².
murielglass
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Angular acceleration of a merry-go-round - no time given!?

Homework Statement



A merry-go-round accelerating uniformly from rest achieves its operating spped of 2.5rpm in 5rev. What is the magnitude of its angular acceleration?

2.5rpm=0.262rad/s

Homework Equations



angular acceleration = change in angular speed / time

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried every possible thing I could think of. I actually know what the answer is (0.0011rad/s^2) but I can't find how they get to that. The teacher told me that if the final angular speed is 2.5rpm and it takes it 5rev to get that final angular speed, then t=2min.. but it doesn't make sense to me since the merrygoround is not moving at that final speed since t=0. plus, i don't get the right answer using t=120s. so I've tried calculating angular speeds for each revolution, assuming that in rev#1 the merry-go-round goes from 0 to 0.5rpm (=0.0524rad/s), from 0.5 to 1rpm, etc, averaging speeds and without averaging, but i keep getting it wrong. I'm guessing there's a conceptual issue I'm missing in this line of thought.

i figured out by the angular acceleration formula that t should equal 238.1s, but I want to know how they get to that number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta
 


rock.freak667 said:
Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta

Yes! It's in my book too. could i use that one? theta is.. final position - initial position?

What would be my position here? final=10pi rad - initial=0?

that actually makes sense..
 


rock.freak667 said:
Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta

i get 0.109 :D

thanks so much. God bless you, my friend.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top