Angular Acceleration - What am I doing wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a cyclist's bike wheels, given that they start from rest and achieve 26 revolutions in 12 seconds. The initial calculations led to an angular velocity of 13.6 rad/s, and an attempt to find angular acceleration resulted in -1.13 rad/s², which was identified as incorrect. Participants pointed out that the correct approach involves using rotational kinematics equations rather than simply dividing angle by time. The clarification emphasizes the importance of applying the right formulas for scenarios involving angular acceleration. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving problems related to angular motion.
ctamasi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am trying to answer the following question:

A cyclist starts from rest and pedals such that the wheels of the bike have a constant angular acceleration. After 12.0 s, the wheels have made 26 revolutions. What is the angular acceleration of the wheels?

My attempt at a solution:

This problem seems extremely simple, but for some reason I'm not getting the answer.

From the question I can determine that the initial angular velocity of the cyclist is equal to zero at t = 0.

When t = 12.0s:

I worked out the 26 revolutions in 12 seconds to 13.6 rad/s by

\frac{26}{12.0} = 2.17 rev/s = \frac{130 rev}{1 min}

Therefore, \frac{130 rev}{1 min} x \frac{2\pi rad}{1 rev} x \frac{1 min}{60 s} = 13.6 rad/s

\omegaf= 13.6 rad/s

So, \alpha = \frac{\Delta\omega}{\Delta(t)}

\alpha = \frac{13.6 rad/s - 0 rad/s}{12.0 s}

\alpha = 1.13 rad/s2

Also, I'm assumining that the wheels are moving in a clockwise direction therefore making the velocity and the acceleration negative; giving me a final answer of -1.13 rad/s2

Now I know this answer is wrong, I just don't know why.

Can someone give me a hand? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hold on a minute! Angle divided by time is angular velocity only if the acceleration is zero (constant angular speed). You have to use the rotational kinematics equations.
 
Oh wow! Thank you so much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top