Angular dependence of electron-positron to two photons

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Photons
wasia
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello,

First of all, it is not a homework question, just something I wonder about.

The dominating electron-positron annihilation process at low energies is photon pair creation. What is the angular dependence of the total cross section?

For some reason I expect the head-on collision to have the highest cross-section and the collinear situation to have the lowest cross-section, is it really the case?

I am not a particle physicist, but I expect the calculation to be pretty difficult, involving IR divergences and collinear divergences. Could you give me a reference to the solution of the problem or the experimental results and perhaps give some physical intuition on the whole thing.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"I expect the head-on collision to have the highest cross-section and the collinear situation to have the lowest cross-section"
I don't know what you mean by this.
In the center of mass system, it is always head-on.
In that system, the photon distribution is spherically symmetric.
The distribution in other initial configurations can be found by Lorentz transformation.
 
Do I understand correctly that you claim that the invariant matrix element does not depend on the angle?
 
Yes. The electron and positron annihilate from a state of zero total spin and zero angular momentum so there is no angular distributon of the two photons.
 
But that's only half the answer. Why zero total spin?

That's more subtle - the answer there is that state has to produce three photons. So for exactly two photons, it's isotropic.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top