Angular Momentum of man holding a weight

AI Thread Summary
A man on a frictionless rotating turntable holds weights that double the system's rotational inertia. When he drops the weights, the angular momentum of the system remains conserved, leading to the conclusion that his angular velocity does not change significantly, contrary to the initial assumption that it would double. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the conservation of angular momentum, which applies as long as the system is considered as a whole, including the dropped weights. The discussion clarifies that the weights, while no longer in his hands, still affect the overall system. Thus, the correct interpretation is that the man's angular velocity remains about the same after dropping the weights.
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A man, holding a weight in each hand, stands at the center of a horizontal frictionless rotating turntable. The effect of the weights is to double the rotational inertia of the system. As he is rotating, the man opens his hands and drops the two weights. They fall outside the turntable. Then:

A. his angular velocity doubles
B. his angular velocity remains about the same
C. his angular velocity is halved
D. the direction of his angular momentum vector changes
E. his rotational kinetic energy increases



Homework Equations


L = I*w
Net Torque = dL/dt


The Attempt at a Solution



So the answer given is B. I kind of casually thought that the rotational inertia of the system decreases by a factor of 2 when the guy drops the weight so the angular velocity must double in order to keep it the same.

I guess don't really understand the physics of why angular momentum isn't conserved. If it's not conserved, then there should be a net torque acting correct? What is that torque?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is conserved, as long as you keep the system large enough. One way to look at the problem is that when the man drops the weights, the weights are still part of the system; they're just no longer in his hands is all.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top