Angular momentum operators for bosons

cygnet1
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I understand how the Pauli matrices can operate on the quantum state of an electron to obtain measurements of its intrinsic spin along the x, y and z axes. I also understand that since these matrices do not commute, it is impossible to determine what all three components were before measurment.

My question is this: What are the corresponding operators that measure the spin components of bosons? For massive bosons (like the W and Z), I imagine these operators would be 3x3 matrices, since there would be three possible values of spin (-1, 0, +1). For massless bosons (like the photon and gluon?), the operators would be 2x2, since 0-spin is not possible. Do these operators have a name, and do they commute?

Thank you in advance for any replies to this question, and please correct any errors I might have made in posing my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cygnet1, The general answer is that the matrices are the set of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that couple together two representations of the rotation group. More specifically, spin 1 particles are vector particles, and the ways to couple two vectors A1 and A2 are quite familiar: A1·A2 forms spin 0, A1 x A2 forms spin 1, and spin 2 is the symmetric traceless tensor that's left over. :smile: Massless bosons work the same way: they're still vectors.
 
cygnet1 said:
For massive bosons (like the W and Z), I imagine these operators would be 3x3 matrices, since there would be three possible values of spin (-1, 0, +1).
Yes.
cygnet1 said:
For massless bosons (like the photon and gluon?), the operators would be 2x2, since 0-spin is not possible.
No, they're still 3x3, but in any allowed state, the amplitude of the 0 component (in the direction of the momentum) must vanish.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top