Angular Momentum, Problem from Landau Lifshitz

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem from Landau Lifshitz's Mechanics, specifically regarding angular momentum and symmetries in a physical system. Key points include the constancy of angular momentum (M) when movement is parallel to the axis of symmetry, and the constancy of momentum (P) when movement occurs within the same field. The symmetry of the system, whether planar or cylindrical, plays a crucial role in determining the behavior of M and P. Understanding how different types of motion affect the Lagrangian is essential for solving the problem mathematically. The discussion emphasizes the importance of symmetries in physics to analyze the problem effectively.
Jimmy84
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
This is problem 3 from section 9 of Mechanics, Landau Lifgarbagez.
I have been trying to understand the problem but I have no idea how to solve it.

Can someone give me a hand please? any comment or suggestion is very welcome.

Thanks for your time.

Best regards.
 

Attachments

  • pppp.png
    pppp.png
    22.7 KB · Views: 657
  • pppp2.png
    pppp2.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 657
Physics news on Phys.org
It is all about something physicists are very fond of,ie,symmetries. For instance in a) you can not notice any displacement parallel to the plane either can you notice any rotation about an axis which is perpendicular to the plane. You must check doing the formal derivation working with the Lagrangian of the system.
 
Sorry for the bad english!

M is constant when the movement is parallel to the axis of simetry of the field
ie:

a) if the field is a plane xy--->symmetry z axis--->M_z=doesnt change

P is constant when the movement is in the "same field", in a) if the particle moves in any direction of x or y P is constant, the reason is because the vectors of the field are orientated in the direction of the axis of symetry (in case a) ), then P only change in that direction.

ie: b) the symetry is a cylinder, then Mz doesn't change in a Z-cylinder. But if you imagine the field, is like infinite cylinders, all parallel, then if you want the particle moves "in the same field", only the z-motion is the correct.
 
in case b) M_z=const. and P_z=const. I think a field compatible with cilindrical symetry mus be one that points in the radial direction perpendicular to z and it's magnitud depends only on the distance to the z axis.
However the key to this problem is understanding what kind o motion does not change the Lagrangian and this allows you to do it fomally(mathematically)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top