The transference of potential energy to kenetic energy and it's effect on momentum

carl fischbach
Lets say that you take an ultra modern spacecraft
like Nasa is researching or may already have and
equip it with a vast potential energy storage
system.Before you embark on your flight a large
quantity of potential energy is stored on board
the ship.The craft is now accelerated to 50% of c
in a straight line.Now we can agree that the craft
possesses momentum x.The ship is traveling at 50%
c and the vast quantity of potential energy,stored
before the fight,is converted to very high speed
particles stored in a ring on board the ship.
Let's say the ships mass has increased by 20%,due
to the conversion of potential energy to kenetic
energy.The ship now possesses momentum y.If you
decelerate the ship in straight line you now have
an imbalanced force*time relationship between
acceleration and deceleration.
There are several possible explanations, the ship
slows when potential energy is converted to
kenetic energy,stored potential energy acts like
mass,the ship does not act heavier when gaining
kenetic energy, or something I've overlooked here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Wow, there really are a lot of misconceptions about special relativity packed into this paragraph. Let's see if we can begin to sort them out.
Originally posted by carl fischbach
and
equip it with a vast potential energy storage
system.
You mean -- fuel?
The craft is now accelerated to 50% of c
in a straight line.
0.5c relative to the stationary earth, I imagine.
Now we can agree that the craft
possesses momentum x.
Momentum depends on the observer. If "we" means specifically "observers on the earth," then sure, we'll call it x.
The ship is traveling at 50%
c and the vast quantity of potential energy,stored
before the fight,is converted to very high speed
particles stored in a ring on board the ship.
Er, okay.
Lets say the ships mass has increased by 20%,due
to the conversion of potential energy to kenetic
energy.
Why should we say this? Where did this 20% figure come from? What sort of potential energy are we talking about?

- Warren
 
My understanding was that energy is proportional to mass regardless of the form of the energy - stretch a rubber band (for example) and it gains mass.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top