Angular Speed of a swinging stick

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular speed of a swinging stick pivoted at one end, conservation of energy principles should be applied instead of using the equation for constant acceleration. The stick's potential energy at the horizontal position converts to kinetic energy as it swings through the vertical. The linear speed of the end of the stick can be determined once the angular speed is calculated. A free body diagram is recommended to analyze forces and motion accurately. Understanding the period of the pendulum's swing can also provide insights into its motion.
snowmx0090
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I having trouble answering this one. I already had to calculate the change in potential energy but am now stuck.

A stick with a mass of 0.168 and a length of 1.00 is pivoted about one end so it can rotate without friction about a horizontal axis. The meter stick is held in a horizontal position and released.
1) As it swings through the vertical, calculate the angular speed of the stick.

I thought I could answer this by using the equation:
(ω_f)^2 = (ω_i)^2 + 2α Δθ
This does not work and I don't know where to go from here.

2) As it swings through the vertical, calculate the linear speed of the end of the stick opposite the axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you drawn a picture yet, or are you just guessing that the equation will work? Make a free body diagram, and examine all the forces throughout the equation. This is really just a pendulum. How long do you think it would take the pendulum to go to the other side, and then back again? What do you suppose its period is?
 
snowmx0090 said:
1) As it swings through the vertical, calculate the angular speed of the stick.

I thought I could answer this by using the equation:
(ω_f)^2 = (ω_i)^2 + 2α Δθ
This does not work and I don't know where to go from here.
That equation assumes constant acceleration, which is not the case here. Hint: Consider conservation of energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top