MHB Angular Velocity for Constant Separation Distance

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Determine the required angular velocity $\omega$ of the relative position vector in order to maintain a constant separation distance $r_0$ for two equal masses.

What equations are needed for this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To me it seems as if you have to balance the potential energy due to gravity against the rotational kinetic energy. That is, it seems as if you're in outer space with two equal masses, and they are rotating around each other like a binary star system. If the distance between them is constant, how fast are they rotating around each other?
 
Ackbach said:
To me it seems as if you have to balance the potential energy due to gravity against the rotational kinetic energy. That is, it seems as if you're in outer space with two equal masses, and they are rotating around each other like a binary star system. If the distance between them is constant, how fast are they rotating around each other?

Fast enough to not be pulled in by the others gravity and a slow enough that they don't fly off.
 
dwsmith said:
Fast enough to not be pulled in by the others gravity and a slow enough that they don't fly off.

Exactly. So I think you'd have the force due to gravity being

$$|F_{g}|=\frac{m^{2}G}{r_{0}^{2}},$$

and the centripetal acceleration being

$$a_{c}=\frac{v_{\tan}^{2}}{r_{0}}=\frac{F_{c}}{m}.$$

Also note that $v_{\tan}=\omega \,r_{0}$.
 
Is this question talking about the position vector for the center of gravity of the two bodies?

If we set the origin to be the center of gravity, the bodies orbit it in a uniform circle with radius 1/2r_0.
I can just find the angular velocity on this circle?
 
Last edited:
dwsmith said:
Is this question talking about the position vector for the center of gravity of the two bodies?

If we set the origin to be the center of gravity, the bodies orbit it in a uniform circle with radius 1/2r_0.
I can just find the angular velocity on this circle?

It shouldn't matter. You could choose your frame of reference to be at the center of one of the bodies just as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top