Angular velocity uniform rod problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a turnstile made of four uniform rods rotating with an initial angular velocity. The problem requires finding the final angular velocity after a mud ball sticks to one of the rods. Participants emphasize using the Conservation of Angular Momentum and calculating the moment of inertia for both the turnstile and the mud ball, noting that the mud ball should be treated as a point mass with an inertia of mr². There is some confusion regarding the angular momentum calculation, particularly the role of cosine in the initial momentum before contact. Clarifications are provided that the angular momentum should be calculated using the initial inertia and angular velocity without the cosine factor.
Poutine
Hi all, recently joined and having abit of trouble with a problem (several actually but I managed to figure out how to get started on one of them).

In any case the problem says:
Four thin, uniform rods each of mass M and length d = .75 m, are rigidly connected to a vertical axle to form a turnstile. The turnstile rotates clockwise about the axle, which is attached to a floor, with initial angular velocity w = -2.0 rad/s. A mud ball of mass m = M/4 and inital speed vi = 15 m/s is thrown and sticks to the end of one rod at an angle 60 degrees. Find the final angular velocity of the ball-turnstile system.

Now I think I have to use the Conservation of Angular momentum. As such I need to find the inertia of the turnstile which I think turns out to be IT=(4/3)*M*d^2

I think the formula I'm going end up with will probably be
It * wf + Ib * wf = IT* wi + angular momentum of the ball before the contact

The thing is I don't know how to get further from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have a table of rotational inertias for different shapes in front of me, so I won't comment on that until tomorrow, after I look it up.

But as for where you go after that, you're basically done. You will have something like:

Iiωi=Ifωf

You know everything except ωf
(Don't forget to treat the mudball as a point mass, so Imud=mr2.)
 
Okay you answered my main question which is what is Imud? But I don't understand why that is true. Why is it mr^2, I was thinking it might have been 2/5 mr^2 but it seems I was wrong but I don't understand why.

Just to be certain the angular momentum before contact would be (M/4)*v*d*cos 60 right?
 
Originally posted by Poutine
Okay you answered my main question which is what is Imud? But I don't understand why that is true. Why is it mr^2, I was thinking it might have been 2/5 mr^2 but it seems I was wrong but I don't understand why.

They don't give you the radius of the ball of mud, so that tells you to treat it as a point (it must be very small compared to the length of the rods). The rotational inertia of a point is I=mr2.

Just to be certain the angular momentum before contact would be (M/4)*v*d*cos 60 right?

No, the cos(60) has nothing to do with it, as that only has to do with the configuration the system is in when the mud does make contact. The angular momentum beforehand is Li=Iiωi.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
828
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
854
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
3K