Annihilation and Creation operator problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of annihilation and creation operators in quantum mechanics to compute the matrix element \langle 1 \mid x^2 \mid 2 \rangle. The participant identifies the position operator x as x = \sqrt{\hbar / 2mw}(a^\dagger + a) and seeks guidance on how to proceed with squaring x and applying it to the states. Key insights include recognizing that the states 1 and 2 are orthonormal and correspond to different quantum states, leading to the conclusion that the matrix element evaluates to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the role of annihilation and creation operators.
  • Familiarity with matrix elements in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of orthonormal basis states in quantum systems.
  • Proficiency in manipulating operators and states in the context of quantum harmonic oscillators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of matrix elements using annihilation and creation operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties of orthonormal states and their implications in quantum systems.
  • Explore the implications of the position operator in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for squaring operators and applying them to quantum states.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on operator methods and matrix element calculations in quantum systems.

Trogdor27
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've looked through all my course notes, but I just don't even know where to start with this problem.

The problem:

\langle 1 \mid x^2 \mid 2 \rangle

Use the annihilation and creation form for x to obtain the above matrix element.

What I do know:

I know that x = \sqrt{\hbar / 2mw}(a^\dagger + a)But where do I go from here? Any help or pointers are much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So...square that x...and then apply it to your states. What is the effect of the creation operator on the state 2? The effect of the annihilation operator? Lastly, consider that your basis states should be orthonormal.
 
Ah - I didn't realize that 1 & 2 correspond to different states, I thought they were just numbers. It all makes sense now, and if I'm right the answer should be zero.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
854
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K