I Annihilation and production of bosons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the production of bosons during electron-positron annihilation processes. It highlights that while a net momentum of zero suggests a single photon cannot be produced, massive bosons like the Z boson can be created. Future electron-positron colliders may achieve energies sufficient to produce top-antitop pairs, which can occur through the exchange of virtual photons or Z bosons. The contributions from these virtual particles cannot be distinctly identified, as their amplitudes combine in the interaction. The role of the Higgs boson is noted as having a smaller impact in this context.
Arcturus7
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am confused about the production of bosons in annihilation processes.

If we have a positron and an electron coming together and annihilating, we can always find a frame in which the net momentum is zero, which would suggest that a single photon can never be produced in such an interaction (but a massive boson such as a Z could be).

However, in a question asked by my prof. in lectures the other week, she said that future electron/positron colliders may operate at energies sufficient to produce top-antitop pairs. How would this occur? And also, how would Feynman diagram for this process look?

I had imagined that the initial annihilation would simply produce a boson which would then decay into the top/antitop pair, however thinking about it, I feel as though the boson should be massive, and therefore not be a photon. Is this correct, or does the fact that the photon is virtual allow it to occur?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arcturus7 said:
or does the fact that the photon is virtual allow it to occur?
Exactly. The (main) process would happen via a virtual photon/Z boson.
As they are virtual, you cannot even say "this was produced via a photon" or "via a Z boson" - their amplitudes add, you cannot distinguish between the processes. The Higgs leads to a much smaller contribution as well, and there are loop processes contributing a little bit.
 
Ah I see - that's great! Thanks for clearing that up :)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top