Another complex line integral question

randybryan
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I have to integrate |z|2dz from 0 to 1 + 2i using the indicated paths. The first path is a straight line from the origin to 1 + 2i and the second has two lines, the first going from 0 to 2i along the y-axis and then from 2i to 1 + 2i, a line parallel to the x axis.

For the first path, the straight line, I used the parameters z = t +2ti and dz = (1 +2i)dt

|z|2 = 5t2 so the integral became \int 5t^2 (1+ 2i) dt between t=0 and t=1

The answer to this integral is 5/3 (1 + 2i), which is correct according to the back of the book.

However I can't get the line integral along the broken paths to generate the same answer. Can anyone spot an obvious mistake?

For the first path, x= 0 so z = 2it and dz = 2idt

|z|2 = 4t2 so the integral becomes \int 8it^2dt between t = 1 and t=0, giving 8/3 i

For path 2, y = 2i, so dy =0 and it just varies along x.

let z = t + 2i dz= 1 and vary from t= 0 to t= 1

|z|2 = t2 + 4

so the integral becomes \int (t^2 + 4)dt between 0 and 1 and the answer is t2/3 + 4t, between t=0 and t=1 which gives 13/3

now 13/3 and 8/3i does not equal 5/3 (1 +2i)

Where have I gone wrong? And I'm sure I've done something embarrassingly stupid
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The contour integrals of ##\int_C |z|^2\,dz## depend on the paths!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top