Another Diff Eq's one: am I wrong?

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



Sorry to be bringing these in quick succession, but this one really has me perplexed. Is it possible that both the solution manual and I have two different but valid answers?

I don't want to just go assuming that I'm right...but I think by subsuming certain parts of the solutions manuals constants in it's solution into constants in my solution, that the two can become equivalent...?!

The problem

c3PgDgU.png


Imgur link to the problem: http://i.imgur.com/c3PgDgU.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



\int \frac{1}{r-kC} dC = \int dt

\frac{-1}{k} \ln{|r-kC|} = t+K_0

\ln{|r-kC|} = -kt + K_1

skipping a couple of steps

C(t) = \frac{r-Ae^{-kt}}{k}

with init. conditions

C(0) = C_0 = \frac{r-A}{k}

A = r - kC_0

So

C(t) = \frac{r - (r-kC_0)e^{-kt}}{k}

C(t) = C_0 e^{-kt}

The answer in the back is

C(t) = \left(C_0 - \frac{r}{k} \right)e^{-kt} + \frac{r}{k}

And the solution given in the solution manual is

RVrLe1R.png


Link to solution: http://i.imgur.com/RVrLe1R.png

I can see that they've don'e some minor things different algebraically and with subsuming certain constants into other constants...I feel like my solution should be equivalent though. Is it? If it is, are there any particular advantages to the form the solution manual has given it in? Be they practical advantages or purely mathematical advantages?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always check by plugging it back in.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
You can always check by plugging it back in.

assume

C_0e^{-kt} = \left(C_0 - \frac{r}{k}\right)e^{-kt}+\frac{r}{k}

0 = \frac{r}{k} - \frac{r}{k}e^{-kt}

0 = \frac{r}{k}\left(1 - e^{-kt}\right)

So, either r = 0 or e^{-kt} = 1

That doesn't seem right.
 
I meant double check each in the original diff eq.

Then double check boundary conditions.
 
kostoglotov said:
C(t) = \frac{r - (r-kC_0)e^{-kt}}{k}
C(t) = C_0 e^{-kt}
That step is clearly wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes kostoglotov and Dr. Courtney
vela said:
That step is clearly wrong.

Thank you. Whenever I do study after a night shift I make stupid mistakes. Cheers :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top