Diff Eqs: can't get a reasonable answer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation of the form \(\frac{dx}{dt} = k(a-x)(b-x)\). The original poster expresses uncertainty regarding their solutions to parts (a) and (b) of the problem, particularly when \(a\) equals \(b\), which raises questions about the validity of their approach and the resulting expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fraction decomposition and its limitations when \(a = b\). There are attempts to clarify the implications of this condition on the solutions derived for both parts of the problem. Some participants suggest re-evaluating the integration approach when \(a\) is assumed to equal \(b\).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the assumptions made about the parameters \(a\) and \(b\). There is a recognition of the need to reconsider the approach to part (b) if \(a\) is set equal to \(b\). Guidance has been offered regarding the implications of this assumption on the solution's form.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of domains in differential equations, particularly in relation to singular points and the behavior of solutions near those points. Participants note that the solutions may need to be approached differently based on the values of \(a\) and \(b\).

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



C1epJzI.png


Imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/C1epJzI.png

My issues arise in part (b) but cause me to doubt my solution to part (a) as well.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dx}{dt} = k(a-x)(b-x)

\int \frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} dx = k \int dt

Use partial fraction decomposition on LHS

\frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} = \frac{A}{a-x}+\frac{B}{b-x}

A(b-x) + B(a-x) = 1

Let x = b

B(a-b) = 1 \ \ B = \frac{1}{a-b}

Let x = a

A(b-a) = 1 \ \ A = \frac{1}{b-a} = \frac{-1}{a-b}

\int \frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} dx = \int \frac{1}{(a-b)(b-x))} - \frac{1}{(a-b)(a-x)} dx

= \frac{1}{a-b} \left[ -\ln{|b-x|} + \ln{|a-x|} \right] = \frac{1}{a-b} \ln{\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|}} = k(t+C)

\ln{\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|}} = (a-b)k(t+C)

\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|} = e^{(a-b)kC}e^{(a-b)kt}

Now let's skip a few steps and get

\frac{a-x}{b-x} = Ke^{(a-b)kt}

already here I can see problems with part (b), as when a = b, \frac{a-x}{b-x} = K

But if we carry on with some algebra from the last step I arrive at

x(t) = \frac{bKe^{(a-b)kt}-a}{Ke^{(a-b)kt}-1}

and if x(0) = 0 then

K = \frac{a}{b}

and then

x(t) = \frac{a(e^{(a-b)kt}-1)}{\frac{a}{b}e^{(a-b)kt}-1}

Now, if a = b x(t) = 0...

Where have I gone wrong?

edit: or is my answer to part (a) correct, and I need to return to the very beginning of the sequence and assume a = b in order to solve (b), thus, the solution to part (a) only holding for the condition that a \neq b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kostoglotov said:
edit: or is my answer to part (a) correct, and I need to return to the very beginning of the sequence and assume a = b in order to solve (b), thus, the solution to part (a) only holding for the condition that a \neq b?

I didn't go through all of the algebra, but your solution to (a) looks ok. If ##a=b##, the partial fraction decomposition is not valid, but you can instead integrate ##1/(a-x)^2## directly. The solution will have a different functional form involving a reciprocal of ##t## rather than an exponential function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
fzero said:
I didn't go through all of the algebra, but your solution to (a) looks ok. If ##a=b##, the partial fraction decomposition is not valid, but you can instead integrate ##1/(a-x)^2## directly. The solution will have a different functional form involving a reciprocal of ##t## rather than an exponential function.

Thanks, I'm still trying to get an intuitive handle on diff eqs. That's why I was getting frustrated. Because my technical skills in everything required in this problem are fine, so not being able to find a mistake, I thought maybe I'd missed something big at the beginning...which it turns out I did I guess.

Domains become really important to consider when modelling with diff eqs then right?
 
kostoglotov said:

Homework Statement



C1epJzI.png


Imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/C1epJzI.png

My issues arise in part (b) but cause me to doubt my solution to part (a) as well.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dx}{dt} = k(a-x)(b-x)

\int \frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} dx = k \int dt

Use partial fraction decomposition on LHS

\frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} = \frac{A}{a-x}+\frac{B}{b-x}

A(b-x) + B(a-x) = 1

Let x = b

B(a-b) = 1 \ \ B = \frac{1}{a-b}

Let x = a

A(b-a) = 1 \ \ A = \frac{1}{b-a} = \frac{-1}{a-b}

\int \frac{1}{(a-x)(b-x)} dx = \int \frac{1}{(a-b)(b-x))} - \frac{1}{(a-b)(a-x)} dx

= \frac{1}{a-b} \left[ -\ln{|b-x|} + \ln{|a-x|} \right] = \frac{1}{a-b} \ln{\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|}} = k(t+C)

\ln{\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|}} = (a-b)k(t+C)

\frac{|a-x|}{|b-x|} = e^{(a-b)kC}e^{(a-b)kt}

Now let's skip a few steps and get

\frac{a-x}{b-x} = Ke^{(a-b)kt}

already here I can see problems with part (b), as when a = b, \frac{a-x}{b-x} = K

But if we carry on with some algebra from the last step I arrive at

x(t) = \frac{bKe^{(a-b)kt}-a}{Ke^{(a-b)kt}-1}

and if x(0) = 0 then

K = \frac{a}{b}

and then

x(t) = \frac{a(e^{(a-b)kt}-1)}{\frac{a}{b}e^{(a-b)kt}-1}

Now, if a = b x(t) = 0...

Where have I gone wrong?

edit: or is my answer to part (a) correct, and I need to return to the very beginning of the sequence and assume a = b in order to solve (b), thus, the solution to part (a) only holding for the condition that a \neq b?

You have gone wrong putting ##a = b## in your ##x(t)## formula because you will have the dreaded (and illegal) form ##0/0##. Either you need to put ##a = b## before solving the DE, or else you need to look at ##\lim_{b \to a} x(t)## after you have solved it. When you do it the latter way you do not get ##x(t) = 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
kostoglotov said:
Thanks, I'm still trying to get an intuitive handle on diff eqs. That's why I was getting frustrated. Because my technical skills in everything required in this problem are fine, so not being able to find a mistake, I thought maybe I'd missed something big at the beginning...which it turns out I did I guess.

Domains become really important to consider when modelling with diff eqs then right?

Kostoglotov,
I have arrived at your same solution. Partial fractions are still valid since we are asssuming a does not equal b in part a. Try letting a=b and integrating just using a substitution for part b. It wouldn't make sense to let a=b with the equation just derived since x(t)= 0 for all t.

Edit: Ahh Ray beat me to the punch. I second that, re do from the beginning letting a=b
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
If you go back to your equations for A and B you already see it's trouble if a = b.

In fact no one would ask you to expand 1/(x - a)2 as a partial fraction - there is no way to make it identical to any constant divided by (x - a).
 
kostoglotov said:
Domains become really important to consider when modelling with diff eqs then right?

The domain is always important. Consider the homogeneous Cauchy-Euler equation:

$$ax^2y'' + bxy' + cy = 0$$

In standard form:

$$y'' + \frac{b}{a x} y' + \frac{c}{a x^2}y = 0$$

##x = 0## would be a regular singular point because the solution may be undefined at ##x = 0##. We would then need to seek solutions for ##x > 0## and ##x < 0## individually.

To derive a solution ##\forall x \neq 0##, then the absolute value would be required.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K