Another Hydrostaic force Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdkinsJr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a hydrostatic force problem involving a submerged cylindrical drum with a radius of 3 ft and a water depth of 10 ft. The user is confused about the pressure calculation, specifically the expression δd_i=pgd_i=62.5(7-y^*_i), questioning the omission of gravitational acceleration in the pressure formula. The density of water is noted as 62.4 lb/ft^3, with gravitational acceleration being 32.174 ft/s^2. The conclusion drawn is that the provided calculation contains an error by neglecting to account for gravitational acceleration. This highlights the importance of correctly applying physical constants in hydrostatic calculations.
AdkinsJr
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
This is a problem right out of the text of my calculus book. So I actually have the work, but I'm confused about something the did.

Problem: Find the hydrostatic force on one end of a cylindrical drum with radius 3 ft. if the drum is submerged in water 10 ft deep.

I attached a diagram

Pressure can be defined:

p=density, d=distance below the surface

P=pgd=\delta d

The area of the ith strip is:

A_i=2\sqrt{9-(y^*_i)^2}\Delta y

The average distance below the surface is:

d_i=7-y^*_i

Then when they write the pressure, they give:

\delta_i=62.5(7-y^*_i)

The implies that pg=62.5.

The density of water is p=62.4 lb/ft^3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_of_water

Gravitational acceleration is 32.174 ft/s^2

So how does \delta d_i=pgd_i=62.5(7-y^*_i) ? Is this an error? It seems that they accidently neglected to account for gravitational acceleration.
 

Attachments

  • model.jpg
    model.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 488
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, it's an error.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top