Another universal gravitation question

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational potential energy increases with height above the Earth's surface, as described by the equation U_g = mgh, where g decreases with altitude. The discussion raises questions about gravitational potential at extreme distances, such as the center of the universe, where gravity may be negligible due to distance from mass. Participants noted that while gravitational potential increases with height, it may decrease in regions far from gravitational fields. The concept of being far from any significant gravitational influence complicates the understanding of potential energy. Ultimately, the relationship between height and gravitational potential is nuanced, especially in the context of space.
JimmyRay
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
As you get further away from the Earth's surface your gravitational potential energy increases, but when you get closer center of the universe (or something like that) your gravitational potential is decreasing... ? Meaning when you are the FURTHEST away from the Earth's surface your gravitational potential is zero...

We were learning about gravitational potential energy and my teacher told us to THINK about that question...

Well when you're at the center of the universe, there is no gravity? Or you're so far away from everything it can't affect you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My mind tells me to choose both, which is why I say those both apply..
There is no gravity in space, then again you're far away from any gravitational fields to even be affected.
So yeah. :D
 
I see... Thank you
 
At the surface of the Earth the acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s2.
This value decreases as you get farther from the surface.

If you look at the equation U_g = mgh you can see that the higher you go the more your potential energy. However, you also have to take into account that as you go higher, g decreases.
 
Last edited:
I understand that the higher you go the more your gravitational potential but what about once you get into space or...the center of the universe... wouldn't your gravitation potential DECREASE even though you've gone HIGHER?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top