Ans. Speed of Light: Clarifying Experiments & Processes

ScienceGuy30
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! Recently my work has been more involved with high energy physics. I have been looking into some things, and I would like help with an understanding of the speed of light. So far, the main ideas I have seen have been thought experiments, with minor (if any) direction to experimental verification. I have two points, that if clarified, would help with my understanding.

1) One thought experiment that keeps coming up as an example is the light clock. The main idea is that a beam of light is reflecting off two mirrors, which can be interpreted as a clock. The thought experiment takes the same clock and gives it a transverse velocity (perpendicular to the direction of travel of the light in the clock). In the reference frame of the light clock, the period seems to be straightforwardly the same. However, looking in as an observer, the light clock will move in both the x and y directions. They go on to say that the time is distorted to allow for light to travel at "c". I do not see how the new speed does not become c'=sqrt(c^2+V_perpendicular^2) in the observer reference frame.

2) It is known that particles can exceed the speed of light in a medium (incurring Cerenkov losses along their path). What is the actual process for why the light is slowing down? Is it related to the light being absorbed and re-emitted from the particles in the medium (thus slowing it down?) or is it intrinsic to the mass actually interacting with the photons (or something else)? If the light is being absorbed and re-emitted, then we should see the lengthening of the pulse of light as it travels through a medium (I am basing this off nuclear absorption cross-sections for photons).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScienceGuy30 said:
I do not see how the new speed does not become c'=sqrt(c^2+V_perpendicular^2) in the observer reference frame.

You just gave the answer in your previous sentence. In the frame in which the light clock is moving, the light travels a distance ##\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}## from one mirror to the other, where ##x## is the distance the clock as a whole moves and ##y## is the distance between the mirrors. The light takes a time ##\sqrt{x^2 + y^2} / c## to travel this distance, according to this frame, so its speed remains ##c##.

Note that the above result is not dictated by theory; it's dictated by experiment. We use the theory of special relativity, in which the speed of light is invariant and moving objects appear time dilated, because that is the theory that matches experiments.

ScienceGuy30 said:
It is known that particles can exceed the speed of light in a medium (incurring Cerenkov losses along their path). What is the actual process for why the light is slowing down? Is it related to the light being absorbed and re-emitted from the particles in the medium (thus slowing it down?) or is it intrinsic to the mass actually interacting with the photons (or something else)?

These aren't really two different ways the light slowdown could happen; they're just two different descriptions of the same process. Mass interacting with photons is photons being absorbed and re-emitted.

ScienceGuy30 said:
If the light is being absorbed and re-emitted, then we should see the lengthening of the pulse of light as it travels through a medium

I don't know whether this is observed experimentally or not, but it's worth checking.
 
  • Like
Likes ScienceGuy30
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top