Answer 4x4 Determinant: a+b+c+d

[archita]

Homework Statement

The determinant
a+1 a a a
b b+1 b b
c c c+1 c
d d d d+1
equals =?
option : a) 1+ a + b+ c+ d
b)a + b+ c+ d
c)a.b.c.d
d)1 + a.b.c.d

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[1] tried using finding the co factors...but the process becomes very length
[2] tried by row-column operations...as below , but nothing workd...
1 0 0 0 a a a a
0 1 0 0 + b b b b
0 0 1 0 c c c c
0 0 0 1 d d d d

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Hi archita, welcome to PF!

This forum supports LaTeX, which you can use to write equations and matrices in a much nicer format...For example, writing:

[$tex]\begin{pmatrix} a+1 & a & a & a \\ b & b+1 & b & b \\ c & c & c+1 & c \\ d & d & d &d+1 \end{pmatrix}[/$tex]

And deleting the $ signs gives:

\begin{pmatrix} a+1 & a & a & a \\ b & b+1 & b & b \\ c & c & c+1 & c \\ d & d & d &d+1 \end{pmatrix}

...Now, for your question...Hint:

\begin{pmatrix} a+1 & a & a & a \\ b & b+1 & b & b \\ c & c & c+1 & c \\ d & d & d &d+1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} a & a & a & a \\ b & b & b & b \\ c & c & c & c \\ d & d & d &d \end{pmatrix}+I=I+\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \\ c \\ d \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 &1 \end{pmatrix}

Where I is the Identity matrix...use Sylvester's detrminant theorem

 

[JANm]

Then the answer would be one but that is none of the options. shouldn't this Sylvester use his theorem one row at a time?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Then the answer would be one but that is none of the options. shouldn't this Sylvester use his theorem one row at a time?

Sylvester's theorem does not give an answer of one...For two column vectors u and v of equal dimension, Sylvester's theorem states that :

\text{det}(I+uv^T)=1+v^T u

In this case you would use u=\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \\ c \\ d \end{pmatrix} and v^T=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 &1 \end{pmatrix}...surely you do not get one using this?

 

[JANm]

Sylvester's theorem does not give an answer of one...For two column vectors u and v of equal dimension, Sylvester's theorem states that :

\text{det}(I+uv^T)=1+v^T u

In this case you would use u=\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \\ c \\ d \end{pmatrix} and v^T=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 &1 \end{pmatrix}...surely you do not get one using this?

Now I can see that the problem is solved! Clever Sylvester.

 

[JANm]

Still had my doubts. Couldn't there be a solution e: 1+a+b+c+d+ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd?

If I take a=1, b=2, c=3, d=4 and calculate the determinant the old way I get 46

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Still had my doubts. Couldn't there be a solution e: 1+a+b+c+d+ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd?

If I take a=1, b=2, c=3, d=4 and calculate the determinant the old way I get 46

Then you're calculating the determinant incorrectly...using: a=1, b=2, c=3, d=4 and calculating the determinant "the old way" gives:

\begin{vmatrix} 2 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 3 & 2 & 2 \\ 3 & 3 & 4 & 3 \\ 4 & 4 & 4 & 5 \end{vmatrix}=\begin{array}{l} 2[3(4*5-3*4)-2(3*5-3*4)+2(3*4-4*4)]-1[2(4*5-3*4)-2(3*5-3*4)+2(3*4-4*4)] \\ +1[2(3*5-3*4)-3(3*5-3*4)+2(3*4-3*4)]-1[2(3*4-4*4)-3(3*4-4*4)+2(3*4-3*4)] \end{array}

=2[24-6-8]-[16-6-8]+[6-9+0]-[-8+12+0]=20-2-3-4=11 \neq 46

 

[JANm]

You are right my 46 is not just. Excel gave for the four to four matrix indeed 11 too.
So my solution e is not just and one of the four a..d is in this case.

I took (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1) +3abcd -(a+1)bcd -(b+1)acd -(c+1)abd -(d+1)abc,
a method which works for three by three matrixes but apparently not for 4 by 4.

 

[archita]

thanks a ton

 

[HallsofIvy]

Since this is a 4 by 4 matrix (even number of rows and columns) its determinant is the same as the determinant of the transpose,
\left|\begin{array}{cccc}a+ 1 & b & c & d \\ a & b+ 1 & c & d \\ a & b & c+ 1 & d \\ a & b & c & d+ 1 \end{array}\right\|

Swapping two rows multiplies the determinant by -1 so doing that twice gives the same determinant,
\left|\begin{array}{cccc}a & b & c & d+1 \\ a & b & c+1 & d \\ a & b+1 & c & d \\ a+1 & b & c & d\end{array}\right|

Subtract the first row from each of the other rows,
\left|\begin{array}{cccc} a & b & c & d+1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & -1\end{array}\right|

and, finally, expand that on the first column.

 

[JANm]

So that will be Det(1:4,1:4) = a * det(2:4,2:4) - det(2:4,1:3) ?
I'll check that!...