Answer: Find Force for Potential Energy Function V

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbrmbrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2
[SOLVED] given potential: find F

Homework Statement



Find the force for the following potential energy function:
V=ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}

Homework Equations



\mathbf{F}=-\nabla V

F_x=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}
F_y=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}
F_z=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial z}

The Attempt at a Solution



By the chain rule:

F_x=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\alpha)]
F_y=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\beta)]
F_z=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\gamma)]

Additionally,
\mathbf{F}=F_x+F_y+F_z

So add it up and factor out the common factors and get
\mathbf{F}=-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y +\gamma z)}(\alpha \mathbf{i}+\beta \mathbf{j}+\gamma \mathbf{k})

And that would be my final answer, except that the back of the book says that
\mathbf{F}=ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y +\gamma z)}(\alpha \mathbf{i}+\beta \mathbf{j}+\gamma \mathbf{k})

Can you help me find my error?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[SOLVED] given potential find F

Homework Statement



Find the force for the following potential energy function:
V=ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}

Homework Equations



\mathbf{F}=-\nabla V

F_x=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}

F_y=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}

F_z=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial z}

The Attempt at a Solution



By the chain rule:

F_x=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\alpha)]

F_y=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\beta)]

F_z=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\gamma)]

Additionally,
\mathbf{F}=F_x+F_y+F_z

So add it up and factor out the common factors and get
\mathbf{F}=-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y +\gamma z)}(\alpha \mathbf{i}+\beta \mathbf{j}+\gamma \mathbf{k})

And that would be my final answer, except that the back of the book says that
\mathbf{F}=ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y +\gamma z)}(\alpha \mathbf{i}+\beta \mathbf{j}+\gamma \mathbf{k})

Can you help me find my error?

Thanks!
 
Check the derivatives

mbrmbrg said:
F_x=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}=-[-(\alpha x+ \beta y + \gamma z)ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}(-\alpha)]

etc. Recall

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}e^{f(x)} = e^{f(x)}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}.
 
You used the chain rule incorrectly.

\textrm{Let}\ \ \ u(x,y,z) = \alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z

Then

\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(ce^{-u}) = \frac{d}{du}(ce^{-u}) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

= -\alpha ce^{-(\alpha x+\beta y+\gamma z)}

likewise for the partial derivatives wrt y and z.
 
As I recall, chain rule goes like "Derivative of the inner function multiplied by the derivative of the outer function evaluated at the inner function".
 
Right... it's the easy math that bites me in the butt.
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top