Answer:Work-Energy Scaling: R_k,R_w = 3,1

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the multiplicative factors R_k and R_w for a particle's kinetic energy and work done when its mass is increased from M to 3M. The formula for kinetic energy is applied, leading to R_k being determined as 3, indicating a tripling of kinetic energy. For work done, the calculations initially led to confusion, but it was clarified that R_w corresponds to the work done by the force, which remains unchanged. Ultimately, the participant resolved their confusion and confirmed their understanding of R_k and R_w. The final values for R_k and R_w are 3 and 1, respectively.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
A particle of mass M moves along a straight line with initial speed v_i. A force of magnitude Fpushes the particle a distance D along the direction of its motion.

assume that the particle's mass is increased to 3M.

B.)By what multiplicative factor R_k does the initial kinetic energy increase, and by what multiplicative factor R_w does the work done by the force increase (with respect to the case when the particle had a mass M)

If one of the quantities doubles, for instance, it would increase by a factor of 2. If a quantity stays the same, then the multiplicative factor would be 1.

You should enter the two factors separated by a comma.

R_k,R_w = ___________



this is what i think:

to find R_k i must use this formula: 1/2*m*v^2
to find R_W, i must use this formula: W=f*d

okay, now to find r_k: 1/2*M*v^2 = 3M (cancel everything and get only 3)

now to find r_w:
W = 1/2*M*v_i^2+F*D -1/2*M*v_i^2 = 1/2*3M*v_i^2+F*D -1/2*3M*v_i^2 <-- i get 0, is this correct?

i'm pretty sure I'm doing it incorrectly, but i don't know how to correct it. can someone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what does Rk and Rw correspond? does Rk or Rw ask for the 3M part or the M part??

Please type out the question exactly how you read it. This doesn't make any sense otherwise.
 
i copied the whole thing (it's online,so i just copied and pasted). but R_K is kinetic energy multiplicative factor and R_w is tk work multiplicative factor

edit: i just figured it out, thanks anyways
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top