Ansys Maxwell -- how to ground an insulator?

AI Thread Summary
Grounding an insulator is not possible, as only conductors can be grounded. In Ansys Maxwell, to analyze leakage current through an insulator, one must assign conductivity to the insulator and ensure a conductive path to ground. The electric field around the insulator can be studied by defining its conductivity and dielectric constant. Ceramic insulators, while effective, can be affected by surface contamination and moisture, which may increase their conductivity. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate simulation results in Ansys Maxwell.
M Umair Wali
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone guide me about how to ground an insulator using Ansys Maxwell 2015?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just to be clear, ANSYS Maxwell is simulation software.
An electrical insulator cannot be grounded. Only electrical conductors can be grounded.
Perhaps I am not understanding your question.
 
actually, i want to design a line having conductor and an insulator and I want to watch the leakage current that flows to the insulator and the behavior of fields around an insulator
so, i have designed an insulator and conductor but i don't have a knowledge about grounding...in maxwell...can u guide me about that??
 
I have not used Maxwell 3D.
If you make a ceramic insulator, it will by default be part of the model.
I looked at some instructional videos for this package. They seem to be pretty good.
For example, this one:
 
First, I've never used Maxwell.
Since Voltage is, by definition, a potential difference, you will have two poles on any voltage source; for DC they will be Positive and Negative. One is connected to your conductor and the other connected to either a return conductor or to a plane that is conceptually Ground. The electric field will be between these conductors.

Case:
  1. If you want to find the current thru the insulator:
    You will have to assign some conductivity (in your case maybe resistance) to the insulator. In the real world, the insulator will be mounted on a support of some sort that is typically grounded, otherwise there is no need for an insulator. There must be a conductive path, no matter how high the resistance, from the surface of the insulator to ground.
  2. If you only want to to see how the electric field is affected by the insulator presence:
    The insulator definition will need both a conductivitynote 2 and a dielectric constant.

NOTES:
1) For case 1, I expect the dielectric constant would have a very small effect, probably not worth the compute time.
2) Ceramic is a pretty good insulator but surface contamination supplies the significant path for leakage currrents, account for this. It is also slightly porous, and if unglazed, will absorb water vapor, increasing its bulk conductivity and dielectric constant.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Tom
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top