Graduate Anti-self Dual Part (2,2) Riemann Curvature Tensor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of defining the anti-self dual part of the Riemann curvature tensor, particularly in relation to the Weyl curvature tensor, which has pairs of anti-symmetric indices. Participants express confusion over the lack of a clear definition provided for the duality concepts being discussed. The Riemann tensor's duals, referred to as left and right duals, can be defined using its two pairs of indices, with the equality of these duals noted in the context of an Einstein metric. There is a call for clearer communication and the use of LaTeX for mathematical expressions to enhance understanding. Overall, the thread highlights the need for precise definitions and clarity in discussing advanced curvature concepts.
abhinavabhatt
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Riemann curvature tensor has two pairs of anti-symmetric index. Is the double of Riemann tensor is Dual ? That how to define the anti self dual part of Riemann tensor.?
i am facing problems in the definition of dual oF some objects which has pair of anti symmetric indices e.g. Weyl curvature tensor. Double dual is there in the literature but given that how to find the anti self dual part of that. the problem is written in attached the file.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what the question is! You say you have a problem with a definition, but you haven't given a definition! Are you trying to figure out what the definition should be?! Where does all this come from and what is it for?

The Riemann tensor has two pairs of indices and you can use either of them to define a dual. Usually they are called the left and the right dual. If the metric is Einstein then they are equal.
 
abhinavabhatt said:
the problem is written in attached the file
This is not acceptable. Please use the PF LaTeX feature to post equations directly in the thread. There is a "LaTeX Guide" button at the lower left of the post window.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K