Antimatter Black Holes: Explaining Matter Prevalence?

Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
Is there any difference between a black hole formed from matter and a black hole formed from antimatter? The no-hair theorem says no, right? If there is no difference, then that means that a black hole can disturb the balance between matter and antimatter, by eating up all the antimatter. Could this explain the preponderance of matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would anti-matter black holes be anymore prevalent than matter black holes at the beginning of the universe in order to cause the prevalence of matter?
 
Khashishi said:
Is there any difference between a black hole formed from matter and a black hole formed from antimatter? The no-hair theorem says no, right?
A couple of caveats: (1) The no-hair theorems only holds for electrovac solutions. Solutions with hair are known for other fields besides EM. (2) I assume you're talking about electrically neutral black holes, since a black hole with charge +Q would become a black hole with charge -Q if you formed it out of the corresponding antimatter ingredients.

Khashishi said:
If there is no difference, then that means that a black hole can disturb the balance between matter and antimatter, by eating up all the antimatter.
I don't follow what you mean by this, but a possibly related idea is this. Black holes have no hair, so when they evaporate, they violate many of the usual conservation laws of particle physics. For example, they have no memory of the lepton number and baryon number that went into them.

-Ben
 
To add to this, you're correct that there's no difference between a black hole that was made from matter and one that was made from antimatter. Conversely, when a black hole evaporates it radiates a thermal distribution composed of anything having quantum numbers of the vacuum, including matter-antimatter pairs.
 
What would happen if an antimatter black hole collided with a matter black hole? Would there be an total conversion to energy or would the resulting debris in any 'explosion' be composed of positively charged or negatively charged matter depending on which of the two black holes was more massive?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top