Antimatter (Proton & Anti-Proton Annihilation)

OlivasCA
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In Antimatter production in a labratory, does anyone know the principle element used to generate antimatter such as anti-protons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antimatter production usually involves two elements: the other being protons (i.e. hydrogen nuclei), which are accelerated to relativistic velocities, and the other being a heavier element with high Z (proton number).

It doesn't really matter which specific element the target is made of, just as long as it is a heavy element. I would suggest something on the order of lead or gold.

Edit: that for antiprotons. Positrons are easier to make: they are emitted in beta plus decay, and also it is possible to accelerate electrons to large velocities, let them hit a target and produce high-energy bremsstrahlung radiation. The radiation (1 MeV photons or higher energy) hits nuclei, producing electron-positron pairs.
 
Last edited:
At Fermilab, they accelerate large currents of protons to about 120 GeV, and slam them into a copper target. Tungsten was used for a while but could not take the instantaneous shock stresses, and cracked. Gold might be good, but 50 pounds or more would be expensive. Gold would get extremely radioactive, and require remote handling. They get lots of stuff out of the copper. Most is positively charged. The negatively charged particles include electrons, muons, pions, kaons, and antiprotons. They select about 9 GeV/c momenta particles and store them.
 
I don't believe it's copper. I believe it's an alloy called Inconel.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top