Any book the elucidates the use of diffirentials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ronaldor9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of understanding the manipulation of differentials in mechanics books, particularly how they are treated as algebraic symbols rather than as distinct entities. The initial concern highlights that first-year calculus education often simplifies the concept of differentials, leading to confusion. Participants seek recommendations for books that clarify the manipulation of differentials without excessive rigor, questioning whether a deeper understanding requires studying differential manifolds. The conversation emphasizes the need for accessible resources that bridge the gap between basic calculus and more advanced mathematical frameworks.
ronaldor9
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
The trouble I have in reading mechanic books, at least the ones I have, is that they manipulate diffirentials as though they are algebraic symbols. Now, I know that typically the first year calculus student is told that the differential operator is to be viewed as one symbol and not the quotient of two diffirentials. Are there any books that can elucidate, and justify, the manipulation of diffirentials in such a manner without being too bogged down in rigor; or would I have to wait to study differential manifolds which I presume does place rigor in such manipulations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top