Any contraindications of inhaling pure O2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weissritter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pure
AI Thread Summary
Humans require oxygen for proper functioning, and higher concentrations of oxygen can enhance performance, especially in scenarios like mountain climbing where oxygen levels decrease with altitude. However, concerns arise regarding the effects of pure oxygen, as studies indicate potential risks, particularly for individuals with conditions like COPD. While emergency medical protocols often use 100% oxygen for patients in respiratory distress, there are risks of oxygen toxicity and disorientation from prolonged exposure to high levels of oxygen. This can lead to a dangerous pH imbalance in the body. Historical examples, such as NASA's Apollo missions, highlight the complexities and dangers of using pure oxygen in confined environments. Overall, while increased oxygen can provide benefits, it must be approached with caution due to potential adverse effects.
Weissritter
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
As cited in any biology book, humans require oxygen for functioning properly. Using non-experimental-based results, and plain logic, an air with higher concentration of O2 gives any human a better performance. When mountain climbers climb mountains, they slowly require more oxygen. If they don't get it, their capabilities go down. If any person living in a high city goes to the sea, he/she could run faster, higher or anything similar because a slight rise of the quantity of oxygen. This only tells me that pure oxygen could have a 'boost' on animals, incluiding humans.
But this link here jumps objecting.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72299.php
So I wanted to ask a scientific community about it. Whaddya think, or know?
And yes, I'm aware that, in a scenario that there is not a single problem, I'd have a hard time getting back into an average 21% ox'd air.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Weissritter said:
As cited in any biology book, humans require oxygen for functioning properly. Using non-experimental-based results, and plain logic, an air with higher concentration of O2 gives any human a better performance. When mountain climbers climb mountains, they slowly require more oxygen. If they don't get it, their capabilities go down. If any person living in a high city goes to the sea, he/she could run faster, higher or anything similar because a slight rise of the quantity of oxygen. This only tells me that pure oxygen could have a 'boost' on animals, incluiding humans.
But this link here jumps objecting.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72299.php
So I wanted to ask a scientific community about it. Whaddya think, or know?
And yes, I'm aware that, in a scenario that there is not a single problem, I'd have a hard time getting back into an average 21% ox'd air.

This doesn't address the study you found and the mechanism that they are studying, but COPD is sometimes considered a contraindication for 100% O2 delivery:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2564043/

However, as that article points out, often our field EMS protocols still call out 100% O2 for COPD patients in respiratory distress -- the benefits of the O2 can outweigh the worries about the hypoxic drive, at least in the temporary pre-hospital EMS transport context.
 
I've wondered about this as well- it's possible to become disoriented when breathing pure O2 for an extended time (a few minutes or so). The best answer I've heard is that the O2 will over time displace CO2, which leads to a pH imbalance.
 
Oxygen toxicity has been known for a 100 years or so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity


and from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuba_diving
Quote:

Oxygen
Oxygen toxicity occurs when oxygen in the body exceeds a safe partial pressure (PPO2).[2] In extreme cases it affects the central nervous system and causes a seizure, which can result in the diver spitting out his regulator and drowning. While the exact limit is idiomatic, it is generally recognized that Oxygen toxicity is preventable if one never exceeds an oxygen partial pressure of 1.4 bar.[21] For deep dives—generally past 180 feet (55 m), divers use "hypoxic blends" containing a lower percentage of oxygen than atmospheric air. For more information, see oxygen toxicity.

unquote.
 
In welding school they taught us that sniffing the pure oxygen from the welding oxygen bottle will send you dizzy. However, they also cautioned that it can kill, by suppressing breathing. The reason is that breathing is a response to CO2 concentration. So medical oxygen has a small amount of CO2 in it to stimulate breathing.
 
Remember that NASA had plans for the lunar astronauts to breath pure oxygen in the Apollo spacecraft on the way to the Moon, a week long (or more) time period. Of course, that didn't work out so well since Apollo 1 burned up during a test, killing three astronauts.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top