Any evidence accumulating in favor of technicolor

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjford80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evidence
robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
this is from lisa randall's knocking on heaven's door

Back in the 1970s, physicists also first considered an alternative potential solution to the hierarchy problem known as technicolor. Models under this rubric involve particles that interact strongly via a new force, playfully named the technicolor force. The proposal was that technicolor acts similarly to the strong nuclear force (which is also known as the color force among physicists), but binds particles together at the weak energy scale—not the proton mass scale.
If technicolor is indeed the answer to the hierarchy problem, the LHC wouldn’t produce a single fundamental Higgs boson. Instead it would produce a bound state, something like a hadron, that would play the role of the Higgs particle. The experimental evidence in support of technicolor would be lots of bound state particles and many strong interactions—very much like the hadrons we are familiar with, but that appear only at much higher energy—at or above the weak scale

Does any know if the LHC has accumulated in favor of technicolor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The LHC has appeared to rule out Technicolor as a viable model, or at least that's according to Nima Arkani Hamed.



I believe this talk is slightly old though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
is your profile in reference to leopold bloom? if so today's bloomsday
 
robertjford80,

Yes! First person to make the connection, congrats. It is indeed Bloomsday although I must admit to never having finished Ulysses. I've read Dubliners and Portrait of the Artist and I've decided to try to make another stab at Ulysses now that I have some more free time.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top