Any Recommendations for a Comprehensive Math Anthology with No Errors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Montrealist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics
Montrealist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

I am looking for a technical book covering the great breakthroughs of mathematics that would also be a good introduction to a variety of fields. The perfect book seems to be 'God Created the Integers: The Mathematical Breakthroughs That Changed History' by Stephen Hawking, but by reading the reviews on amazon it seems that book is full of typos and errors in the formulas. Are there any similar books that you could recommend?

I am presently a first year engineering physics student and would like to be introduced to mathematical fields not covered in my program.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you tried "The Princeton Companion to Mathematics"?
 
Thank you micromass it seems to be exactly what I'm looking for!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top