Anybody can tell me how to find y1 , y2 , angle 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter bent al physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem involving two unknown angles and lengths, where the equations provided are insufficient due to a missing equation. The equations include relationships involving sine functions and the lengths of two sides, but without a specified angle between Y1 and Y2, the problem cannot be fully resolved. Participants note that while five equations exist for six unknowns, choosing one variable as a parameter could lead to a solution, though it may not be practical. There is also a suggestion that the vertex position could vary, allowing for multiple valid configurations. Overall, the consensus is that additional information is necessary to solve the problem effectively.
bent al physics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Anybody can tell me how to find y1 , y2 , angle 1 and 2

[ see the file attached ]
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem cannot be solved because it lacks one equation:there can be written 5 equations for the 6 unknowns.If the angle between Y_{1} and Y_{2} were given,the problem would be solved.
Equations:
\sin\alpha_{1}=\frac{150}{Y_{1}}
\sin\alpha_{2}=\frac{220}{Y_{2}}
a+b=350
a^{2}+150^{2}=Y_{1}^{2}
b^{2}+220^{2}=Y_{2}^{2}

As u can see,an equation is missing.There is an option of solving for 5 unknowns wrt une unknown chosen as parameter.But that wouldn't be too convenient,right??

Daniel.

PS.Alpha_{1},alpha_{2} are the two angles unknown (labeled through "angle 1" and "angle 2",respectively),while "a" and "b" are the two remaining sides of the wo trianges which have not been labeled on the picture.
 
ahrkon and daniel is absolutely right.
What a dreadful mistake on my part.
 
Last edited:
I get the impression that Heron's formula is implied by the rest (and hence brings no new information).

I don't see any reason why the vertex in the middle has to be in one position and no other. So far any position between the two segments with known size (150 and 220 m) would satisfy all equations. Isn't that so?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top