Anyone familiar with Peano' (or Grassman) algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Peano
enigma
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,738
Reaction score
20
I'm an engineer, not a mathematician...

the professor has assigned several proof questions, and I'm having difficulty answering them...

(This may need to be moved to homework help, but the topic is unusual, so I thought I'd get better response here)

Terminology: v is a join operation, ^ is a meet operation D[] is a bracket operation

Example:

Show that when:

A = a_1 \vee a_2, B = b_1 \vee b_2, \ and\ n = 2

then

A \wedge B = -D[a_2 , b_1 , b_2] a_1 + D[a_1 , b_1 , b_2] a_2
= D[a_1 , a_2 , b_2] b_1 - D[a_1 , a_2 , b_1] b_2

If the meet is zero, then assuming that the sets (a_1, a_2) and (b_1, b_2) are both independent, the four brackets must be zero. Show that, in this case, the two subspaces A_s and B_s are the same.

Now, proving the first part is fairly simple: just run though the definition of the meet.

I'm having difficulty with the second part. I thought that the definition of the meet is the intersection of the two subspaces. If the subspaces are the equal, then wouldn't the meet be either As or Bs?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Answering my own question somewhat:

OK. If the sets are independant, and \alpha a_1 + \beta a_2 = 0 , then \alpha \ and \ \beta need to be zero because independancy implies a_1 \ and \ a_2 are not equal.

If D[a_i, b_i, b_j] \ and \ D[a_i, a_j, b_i] are zero for any combination of i and j, that means that the two subspaces A and B are linearly dependant for any combination of bases. This must mean that they are the same subspace.

Is that correct?
 
Pardon my ignorance; I have barely ever done any reading on Grassman algebra. I probably won't be able to help you. But what is the definition of n?
 
n is the number of dimensions in addition to the projective plane: PA[Rn+1], where PA represents peano algebra.

so, the dimensions of a two dimensional projective space is PA[R2+1] corresponding to e0 e1 and e2 as the three coordinates, with e1 being the x direction, e2 being the y direction and e0 being the perspective direction.

*I hope I'm not botching up my terminology here...*
 
Ummm

I'll get back to you in a few weeks on this.
 
You must know the answer by now! If you have time, could you sketch it out for us? If you're too busy, that's understandable.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top