Anyone seen any neat physics paper for a casual talk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter linda300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding accessible and engaging quantum physics journal articles suitable for a casual talk or mini colloquium, specifically targeting an audience with undergraduate-level understanding of quantum mechanics. The original poster seeks recent publications from reputable sources like Nature or Physical Review Letters that simplify complex concepts. While some participants suggest that any quantum topic can be made relatable with sufficient understanding and passion, others emphasize the importance of clarity and accessibility in presentation. The poster mentions discovering a promising article that only requires basic knowledge of bra-ket notation and unitary transformations, indicating a preference for papers that balance conceptual depth with straightforward explanations. The conversation highlights the challenge of selecting appropriate material that engages an audience without overwhelming them.
linda300
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
Hello,

Would anyone happen to know of any neat physics (more preferably quantum related within the last year or so) journal articles which would be good to do a casual talk / mini colloquium?

I've been trying to find something published in nature of physical review letters but some of the more interesting things I have found (in PRL) are far too involved for this kind of talk.

Has anyone seen any neat, kind of straight forward papers?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How much time do you have, and what is the audience and purpose of the talk?
Most papers use quantum physics in some way.
 
Couldn't any subject essentially be discussed in a casual manner? I know some things require more critical thinking in terms of presentation than others; but it's my belief that if you understand a subject thoroughly enough, and are passionate about it, you can contrive ways to make it relatable and interesting to others. Easier said than done, of course.
 
Hey guys,

Kimosabae, sorry but I don't think what you have said is very true at all, if you want to get the message across sometimes you can't just keep it to the basics.

mfb, the talk is around 30 minutes, the audience will generally be people with undergraduate degrees with very basic understanding of quantum mechanics. I've been trying to find neat papers which explain concepts using the basics, I actually think I might have found a good nature experimental article which essentially requires only the background knowledge of bra-ket notation and unitary transformations, the rest is pretty much conceptual.

But yea if you have seen anything cool please let me know
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top