AP Physics: Horse Pulls Cart - Is My Thought Process Right?

AI Thread Summary
A horse pulling a cart experiences a force from the cart that pulls back, but this does not prevent the cart from moving. The key point is that the forces acting on the horse and the cart are separate; the horse exerts a force on the cart, creating a net force that allows the cart to move. While Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, these forces do not cancel each other out because they act on different objects. Therefore, the horse can indeed pull the cart forward despite the opposing force. Understanding the distinction between forces acting on different objects clarifies the mechanics of motion in this scenario.
JustinvanZyl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright so I just wrote an AP physics test and one of the true or false questions was:

A horse pulls a cart and the cart pulls back on the horse with the same force. Does the cart move? (the cart starts at rest)

I said false because in order for an object to move it needs a net force but if the two opposing forces cancel out and the net force is zero then the object won't move.

Is my though process right? or am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JustinvanZyl said:
I said false because in order for an object to move it needs a net force but if the two opposing forces cancel out and the net force is zero then the object won't move.
If the the two opposing forces both pull on the same object they cancel out and the object won't move. But here the two opposing forces pull on two different objects.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top