Apocentre and Eccentricity of a Comet's Orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the apocentre and eccentricity of a comet's orbit given its velocity of 38 km/s. The semi-major axis was determined to be approximately 4.02 x 10^11 meters, suggesting a highly eccentric orbit typical of comets. However, the problem lacks sufficient information to accurately determine the eccentricity, which is estimated to be between 0.9 and 1. The apocentre could range from near Earth's orbit at 1 AU to nearly 5.4 AU, depending on the eccentricity. Overall, the calculations indicate that the comet's orbit resembles that of a wayward asteroid rather than a typical comet.
PChar
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a comet passes close to the Earth with a velocity of 38km/s, how far is the apocentre of its orbit from the Sun? What is the eccentricity of its orbit?


Homework Equations


Vis-Viva Equation:

(V)_{ecc}^{2} = GM [ \frac{2}{R} - \frac{1}{a} ]

Apocentre distance:

a(1 + e)


The Attempt at a Solution



I found the semi-major axis using the vis-viva equation, but I'm really not sure what to do next,I think I should be trying to find where the radial velocity is zero, but I don't seem to have enough information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I just realized what I need to do. Do I just need to plug the apocentre distance into the vis-viva equation and solve for e?

EDIT: nevermind, still stuck, just tried this and I got a negative eccentricity.
 
Last edited:
PChar said:

Homework Statement


If a comet passes close to the Earth with a velocity of 38km/s, how far is the apocentre of its orbit from the Sun? What is the eccentricity of its orbit?

Is the above the entire problem statement, word for word?

As it is, the problem statement doesn't provide enough information to determine the precise shape of the comet's orbit. The semimajor axis is accessible via the vis-viva equation as you've already determined. What value did you get? What does that say about the general overall shape of the orbit? Can you at least put bounds on the possible values of the eccentricity?
 
Yeah, that's all the problem statement says, word for word.

Anyway, I got 4.02*10^{11} metres as the semimajor axis. Given that it's a comet, I'm at least assuming that the orbit is highly eccentric, less than 1, since it asks for the apocentre, but greater than, probably 0.9, but without more information it's difficult to get more precise.
 
PChar said:
Yeah, that's all the problem statement says, word for word.

Anyway, I got 4.02*10^{11} metres as the semimajor axis. Given that it's a comet, I'm at least assuming that the orbit is highly eccentric, less than 1, since it asks for the apocentre, but greater than, probably 0.9, but without more information it's difficult to get more precise.

Yup. 4.02x1011m is about 2.7 AU. 2a about 5.4 AU. Mars' orbit is about 1.5 AU, Jupiter's about 9.5 AU. Looks more like a wayward asteroid than a comet. The aphelion could be as far out as nearly 5.4 AU (assuming the comet is to survive its passage around the Sun), and could be a lot closer to the Earth's 1 AU if the eccentricity is closer to zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top