Apparent Angular Size in Pinhole Camera Concept

Austin0
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
1
Hi This is regarding the pinhole camera concept regarding apparent angular size.

If we take the simultaneity train and assume the lightning strikes are behind translucent ends of the observers car and that the observer has two pinhole cameras facing forward and back: In the view of the track observer the forward camera has moved toward the front of the car during the lights transit, and therefore the end appears bigger , subtends a larger angle.
Looking into the camera it is seen that as the light moves from the pinhole to the back, the film plane has moved forward, thus producing a smaller image. equivalent to moving a darkroom projector closer to the film plane.
Of course the exact opposite effect takes place with regard to the rear.
So in both directions this is logically consistent wrt the angular size.

But what about luminosity?? Photons per unit area?
The forward camera already has a larger area and less falloff that is intering the camera. Then the effect of the forward motion would concentrate that even more , just like moving a projector closer to the film plane.
And of course the effect would be exactly opposite toward the rear , where the motion away from the pinhole would tend to diffuse the image even more.
Yet I have to assume that this wound not actually take place but cannot figure out a mechanism that would prevent it from occurring . Any ideas? Something obvious I am missing equivalent to doppler self cancellation??.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that if a flash produces an expanding sphere of light which is uniform in all directions in one frame (same number of photons per unit area on all parts of the sphere), then in other frames although the distribution will still be a sphere expanding at c, it will no longer be uniform in those frames (if you're talking about the frame of an observer moving to the right in the frame where the distribution is uniform, then in his frame the light should be more concentrated on the left side of the sphere than the right side). So, although I haven't really thought about the details of the pinhole setup, it might well be that both frames could agree the luminosity is greater for the light coming through one pinhole than the other, though the reasons would probably be different in each frame.
 
JesseM said:
Keep in mind that if a flash produces an expanding sphere of light which is uniform in all directions in one frame (same number of photons per unit area on all parts of the sphere), then in other frames although the distribution will still be a sphere expanding at c, it will no longer be uniform in those frames (if you're talking about the frame of an observer moving to the right in the frame where the distribution is uniform, then in his frame the light should be more concentrated on the left side of the sphere than the right side). So, although I haven't really thought about the details of the pinhole setup, it might well be that both frames could agree the luminosity is greater for the light coming through one pinhole than the other, though the reasons would probably be different in each frame.

I had never thought of the light sphere in that regard,,it is a good tip . I will give it some thought thanks
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top