Apparent speed of light in transparent medium

AI Thread Summary
The apparent speed of light in a transparent medium is explained by the motion of electrons in the oscillating electric field from the source, which causes these electrons to emit a lagging electric field. This results in a superposition of waves, where the medium's wave is out of phase with the source wave, leading to a smaller apparent speed of light. Despite the medium's wave having a smaller amplitude, the superposition wave can have a greater amplitude due to the compression of energy in space as the wave slows down. The emitted field is 90 degrees out of phase with the driving field because the electron's position varies in phase with the electric field, while its speed varies sinusoidally. This discussion highlights the complex interactions between light and matter in transparent media.
bakshi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The fact that light has a smaller apparent speed in a transparent medium can be explained classically by considering the motion of the electrons of the medium in the oscillating (radiation) electric field produced by the source. Because they accelerate, these electrons emit an electric field that is 90 degrees out of phase (lagging) with the field produced by the source at the detection point. The total field at the detection point could then be written as a superposition of a cosine wave (source) and a sine wave (medium) having different amplitudes (the medium wave having a smaller amplitude). As expected, the superposition wave is out of phase (lagging) the cosine wave from the source, explaining the smaller apparent speed of light in the medium.

However, the amplitude of this superposition wave is GREATER than the amplitude of the cosine wave, which does not sound right. Putting a transparent medium between the source and the detection point obviously cannot increase the amplitude, right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
bakshi said:
The fact that light has a smaller apparent speed in a transparent medium can be explained classically by considering the motion of the electrons of the medium in the oscillating (radiation) electric field produced by the source. Because they accelerate, these electrons emit an electric field that is 90 degrees out of phase (lagging) with the field produced by the source at the detection point. The total field at the detection point could then be written as a superposition of a cosine wave (source) and a sine wave (medium) having different amplitudes (the medium wave having a smaller amplitude). As expected, the superposition wave is out of phase (lagging) the cosine wave from the source, explaining the smaller apparent speed of light in the medium.

However, the amplitude of this superposition wave is GREATER than the amplitude of the cosine wave, which does not sound right. Putting a transparent medium between the source and the detection point obviously cannot increase the amplitude, right?

Yes it can. What it cannot do is increase the net energy- that resides in
both the electric and magentic fields, and in the polarization (induced
vibrations) of the atoms of the matter.
 
Why do you say the emitted field is 90 degrees out of phase with the driving field?

Claude.
 
Claude Bile said:
Why do you say the emitted field is 90 degrees out of phase with the driving field?

Claude.

If we treat each atom in the medium as a harmonic oscillator, then it can be shown that the position of an electron within that atom will vary in phase with the electric field. It can also be shown that a plane of charges that are moving together produces an electric field equal to a constant times the speed of those charges. If position varies cosinusoidally (in phase with the field), then speed varies sinusoidally. The emitted field (sine) is thus 90 degrees out of phase with the driving field (cosine).
 
Last edited:
The result is intuitive, if a wave slows down, its energy is compressed in space and you would expect the amplitude to increase.

Claude.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top