Apparentlyx[SUP]2[/SUP]/y + yis the same

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical equivalence of the expressions x²/y + y and (x² + y²)/y. Participants confirm that the two expressions are indeed equivalent when simplified correctly. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding common denominators in this context. A specific example using x = 4 and y = 3 is provided to illustrate the calculations. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that x²/y + y simplifies to (x² + y²)/y.
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
apparently

x2/y + y

is the same as

x2+y2/y

I've done the calculations and it's true. But I can't recall the rule that allows you to do that. It's something about common denominators but I can't remember which.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


never mind, I got it. if you let x = 4 and y = 3

then

4/3 + 3 = 4/3 + 9/3

and 9/3 = 32/3
 


bobsmith76 said:
never mind, I got it. if you let x = 4 and y = 3

then

4/3 + 3 = 4/3 + 9/3

and 9/3 = 32/3

Do you mean x2{/SUP]/y + y = x2/y + y2/y? If so, you multiply the expression by 1 = y/y (y not zero).
 


bobsmith76 said:
apparently

x2/y + y

is the same as

x2+y2/y
No, it is not. But it is the same as (x2+ y2)/y. I assume that is what you meant.

I've done the calculations and it's true. But I can't recall the rule that allows you to do that. It's something about common denominators but I can't remember which.
"which"? There is only one denominator!

\frac{x^2}{y}+ y= \frac{x^2}{y}+ \frac{y^2}{y}= \frac{x^2+ y^2}{y}
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top