Appearance of Warp Bubble Internal Volume to Distant Observer

In summary: This tells you nothing about comparing... volumes?I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Can you please clarify?I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Can you please clarify?
  • #1
Onyx
115
3
TL;DR Summary
Questions about how a warp bubble's internal volume would appear to a distant observer at a single moment of their time.
At a single moment of coordinate time ##t##, would a distant observer perceive a warp bubble's interior volume as blown up, or would it seem compressed? Looking in the catalogue of spacetimes at the static local tetrad of the Alcubierre metric, the ##e^x_{(x)}## leads me to think that a static observer would see the flat interior differently from the exterior.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Doesn't this belong in the science fiction and fantasy section?
 
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
phinds said:
Doesn't this belong in the science fiction and fantasy section?
The Alcubierre metric is a valid solution of the Einstein Field Equation, so questions about it are on topic in this forum.
 
  • Informative
Likes phinds
  • #4
Isn't the interior causally disconnected from the exterior? In which case it doesn't look like anything to an observer outside the bubble because they can't see it.
 
  • #5
How does one "see" spacetime?
 
  • #6
PeroK said:
How does one "see" spacetime?
For starters, if they can see the spaceship or other objects in the interior, how would they appear?
 
  • #7
Ibix said:
Isn't the interior causally disconnected from the exterior? In which case it doesn't look like anything to an observer outside the bubble because they can't see it.
I thought it was only causally disconnected if the bubble moved at apparently superluminal speed. I'm thinking more of a subliminal case.
 
  • #8
Onyx said:
For starters, if they can see the spaceship or other objects in the interior, how would they appear?
Appearances can be deceptive!
 
  • #9
Onyx said:
For starters, if they can see the spaceship or other objects in the interior, how would they appear?
For example, try calculating whether you "see" length contraction?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #10
Ibix said:
Isn't the interior causally disconnected from the exterior?
I don't think this is correct; AFAIK there are no causal horizons in Alcubierre spacetime.

The paths of causal curves that go through the interior won't be what you might expect based on intuitions about ordinary flat spacetime.
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
For example, try calculating whether you "see" length contraction?
PeroK said:
For example, try calculating whether you "see" length contraction?

PeroK said:
For example, try calculating whether you "see" length contraction?
By this, do you mean calculate null geodesics starting from the interior and headed toward the observer?
 
  • #12
Onyx said:
By this, do you mean calculate null geodesics starting from the interior and headed toward the observer?
Possibly. Although I wouldn't have phrased it like that.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
Possibly. Although I wouldn't have phrased it like that.
I guess what I'm really thinking about, more than how the observer would see it, is whether the volume elements in the center are contracted compared to the area completely outside the warp bubble. The image here represents the rate of "expansion" that is happening for different spatial points in a constant time hypersurface. Looking at the front, the rate of shrinking gets bigger then gets smaller and then disappears, which suggests to me that the volume remains contracted until it passes through the rear expanding zone. Sorry if anything seems vague, I'm just trying to keep the post short.
Alcubierre.png
 
  • #14
How do you compare spatially separated volumes? Isn't volume a summation of local measurements? According to the integral calculus it is!
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #15
PeroK said:
How do you compare spatially separated volumes? Isn't volume a summation of local measurements? According to the integral calculus it is!
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here. Is this an answer to my question about the volume inside?
 
  • #16
Onyx said:
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here. Is this an answer to my question about the volume inside?
I suggesting you think about what "the volume a distant observer sees" could possibly mean. If you look at a distant house it may look tiny, but that doesn't mean anything. What process are you proposing for a distant observer to measure the volume?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #17
Onyx said:
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here. Is this an answer to my question about the volume inside?
We are asking you to stop tossing the word “volume” around until you have paused to consider what a slippery concept it is in a curved spacetime. We calculate the volume of a region by integrating infinitesimal volume elements across the entire region…. But this integration requires that we evaluate all the volume elements at the same time, and there is no unique and non-arbitrary definition of “at the same time” in a curved spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn, Vanadium 50 and PeroK
  • #18
We're swirling down the same trajectory as your past thread. If you don't define how a distant observer measures volume, how can your question possibly be answered?
 
  • #19
PeroK said:
I suggesting you think about what "the volume a distant observer sees" could possibly mean. If you look at a distant house it may look tiny, but that doesn't mean anything. What process are you proposing for a distant observer to measure the volume?
Well, I maybe the redshifting of light from a stationary source inside the bubble by a stationary observer far away?
 
  • #20
Onyx said:
maybe the redshifting of light from a stationary source inside the bubble by a stationary observer far away?
This tells you nothing about comparing volumes.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #21
PeterDonis said:
This tells you nothing about comparing volumes.
Well, for the process I guess there could be a measurement done by someone inside the bubble and a similar one done by the distant observer, and they could compare them.
 
  • #22
Nugatory said:
We are asking you to stop tossing the word “volume” around until you have paused to consider what a slippery concept it is in a curved spacetime. We calculate the volume of a region by integrating infinitesimal volume elements across the entire region…. But this integration requires that we evaluate all the volume elements at the same time, and there is no unique and non-arbitrary definition of “at the same time” in a curved spacetime.
That definitely makes sense because even with the two stationary observers their clocks will still run differently. But I've also seen it described very objectively, like in this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interior_Schwarzschild_metric?wprov=sfla1

Is it just more straightforward when dealing with a diagonal metric?
 
  • #23
Onyx said:
I guess there could be a measurement done by someone inside the bubble and a similar one done by the distant observer, and they could compare them.
What kind of measurement?
 
  • #24
Onyx said:
I've also seen it described very objectively, like in this article
That article talks about the Schwarzschild metric, which is static, so there is a sensible notion of "stationary observers". The Alcubierre metric is not, and there is no sensible notion of "stationary observers".
 
  • #25
PeterDonis said:
What kind of measurement?
Measure with clocks how long it takes to get from one point to another.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
  • #26
PeterDonis said:
That article talks about the Schwarzschild metric, which is static, so there is a sensible notion of "stationary observers". The Alcubierre metric is not, and there is no sensible notion of "stationary observers".
Because even a person far away at rest with respect to their frame is not at rest with respect to the bubble person's frame?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
  • #27
We are two dozen messages into this thread, and we still don't have a definition for what you are asking.
 
  • #28
Onyx said:
Measure with clocks how long it takes to get from one point to another.
How will you measure the speed of whatever is crossing the bubble in order to convert time taken into distance travelled? Will you have to correct different amounts depending on where the bubble is? And will distant observers in different states of motion and/or position agree on any of it?
Onyx said:
Because even a person far away at rest with respect to their frame is not at rest with respect to the bubble person's frame?
No, because the spacetime isn't stationary so there isn't an invariant notion of what you mean by "space". All of the questions in this thread stem from this fact. You need to define "space" before you can start to answer the question, and you have considerable latitude over how to do that - probably enough that the answer to your question is either yes or no depending on how you choose your definition.
 
  • #29
Onyx said:
Measure with clocks how long it takes to get from one point to another.
What point to what other point? What will this measurement tell you?
 
  • #30
(Thread prefix level changed A-->I for now)...
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory
  • #31
Onyx said:
Measure with clocks how long it takes to get from one point to another.
That requires some additional assumptions that you may not be aware of. We need some rule for relating times on the two clocks (“when the in-bubble clock reads X the distant clock reads Y”) before they can be compared - otherwise we just have two unrelated intervals from two unrelated clocks. This rule is called a “simultaneity convention” and it is pretty much an arbitrary assumption; depending on what we assume we can get pretty much any answer to your question we please.

There are similar difficulties with defining distance: the distance between two points in space (remember, a point in space is a line in spacetime) depends on where they are at the same time.
Because even a person far away at rest with respect to their frame is not at rest with respect to the bubble person's frame?
There is no meaningful way of comparing the velocities of two objects far enough apart that curvature effects matter. I can be at rest in some local frame, and you can be at rest in some other local frame, but unless the two overlap (in which case they’re really just one frame) our relative velocity is undefined so we cannot be said to be or not be at rest relative to one another.

I have already suggested that you stop tossing the word “volume” around until you can precisely define it in the context of this problem. You may want to be similarly careful with “velocity” and “distance” - the ordinary meaning of these words depends on hidden assumptions about flat spacetime.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #32
Ibix said:
How will you measure the speed of whatever is crossing the bubble in order to convert time taken into distance travelled? Will you have to correct different amounts depending on where the bubble is? And will distant observers in different states of motion and/or position agree on any of it?

No, because the spacetime isn't stationary so there isn't an invariant notion of what you mean by "space". All of the questions in this thread stem from this fact. You need to define "space" before you can start to answer the question, and you have considerable latitude over how to do that - probably enough that the answer to your question is either yes or no depending on how you choose your definition.
Specifically, would this involve redefining the spatial coordinates to something else?
 
  • #33
Vanadium 50 said:
We are two dozen messages into this thread, and we still don't have a definition for what you are asking.
It's clear that I don't understand what I've been asking as well as I thought.
 
  • #34
Onyx said:
Summary: Questions about how a warp bubble's internal volume would appear to a distant observer at a single moment of their time.

At a single moment of coordinate time ##t##, would a distant observer perceive a warp bubble's interior volume as blown up, or would it seem compressed? Looking in the catalogue of spacetimes at the static local tetrad of the Alcubierre metric, the ##e^x_{(x)}## leads me to think that a static observer would see the flat interior differently from the exterior.

Onyx said:
It's clear that I don't understand what I've been asking as well as I thought.
Answers to your questions might be given in (the figures of) "Detailed study of null and time-like geodesics in the Alcubierre Warp spacetime" by Thomas Muller and Daniel Weiskopf,

https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5650
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Nugatory, Ibix and PeroK
  • #35
Onyx said:
Specifically, would this involve redefining the spatial coordinates to something else?
I would suggest that you stop thinking in terms of coordinates and start thinking in terms of actual physical measurements. Which means actual physical measurements that you can describe in detail.
 
<h2>1. How does the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume change for a distant observer?</h2><p>The appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume changes drastically for a distant observer due to the effects of time dilation. As the warp bubble travels at superluminal speeds, time slows down inside the bubble. This means that for a distant observer, the bubble appears to be compressed in the direction of travel, making it appear smaller than it actually is.</p><h2>2. Can a distant observer see inside a warp bubble?</h2><p>No, a distant observer cannot see inside a warp bubble. The intense gravitational and electromagnetic forces within the bubble create a barrier that prevents any light or information from escaping. This is known as the "light barrier" and is a fundamental principle of warp travel.</p><h2>3. What determines the size of a warp bubble's internal volume to a distant observer?</h2><p>The size of a warp bubble's internal volume to a distant observer is determined by the speed and direction of the bubble's travel. The faster the bubble travels, the more compressed it appears, and the smaller its internal volume will appear to a distant observer. The direction of travel also plays a role, as the bubble will appear more compressed in the direction of travel and larger in the opposite direction.</p><h2>4. Can the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume be manipulated?</h2><p>Yes, the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume can be manipulated by adjusting the speed and direction of travel. By changing these variables, the size and shape of the bubble's internal volume can be altered, making it appear larger or smaller to a distant observer.</p><h2>5. How does the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume affect its use for space travel?</h2><p>The appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume does not affect its use for space travel. The bubble's size and shape are irrelevant to its function, which is to create a distortion in space-time to allow for faster-than-light travel. However, the appearance may affect the perception and understanding of warp technology for distant observers.</p>

1. How does the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume change for a distant observer?

The appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume changes drastically for a distant observer due to the effects of time dilation. As the warp bubble travels at superluminal speeds, time slows down inside the bubble. This means that for a distant observer, the bubble appears to be compressed in the direction of travel, making it appear smaller than it actually is.

2. Can a distant observer see inside a warp bubble?

No, a distant observer cannot see inside a warp bubble. The intense gravitational and electromagnetic forces within the bubble create a barrier that prevents any light or information from escaping. This is known as the "light barrier" and is a fundamental principle of warp travel.

3. What determines the size of a warp bubble's internal volume to a distant observer?

The size of a warp bubble's internal volume to a distant observer is determined by the speed and direction of the bubble's travel. The faster the bubble travels, the more compressed it appears, and the smaller its internal volume will appear to a distant observer. The direction of travel also plays a role, as the bubble will appear more compressed in the direction of travel and larger in the opposite direction.

4. Can the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume be manipulated?

Yes, the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume can be manipulated by adjusting the speed and direction of travel. By changing these variables, the size and shape of the bubble's internal volume can be altered, making it appear larger or smaller to a distant observer.

5. How does the appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume affect its use for space travel?

The appearance of a warp bubble's internal volume does not affect its use for space travel. The bubble's size and shape are irrelevant to its function, which is to create a distortion in space-time to allow for faster-than-light travel. However, the appearance may affect the perception and understanding of warp technology for distant observers.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
713
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
412
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top