Application of Maxwell-Ampere's law

  • Thread starter Thread starter careman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Maxwell-Ampere's law to determine the magnetic field generated by two equal and opposite charges moving along the y-axis. Participants emphasize the need to show work for better assistance, noting that the current density is zero in the xz plane, leading to a potential conclusion that the magnetic field could also be zero. They explore the implications of time-varying electric fields and the limitations of using Gauss's law in this context. The conversation includes deriving the electric field at a point on the xz plane based on the contributions from both charges. Ultimately, the participants aim to clarify the relationship between the electric field and the magnetic field in this dynamic scenario.
careman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two equal and opposite charges (± q) start from positions ± y, respectively and move on the y-axis with constant velocity u, so that they approach symmetrically the axis origin. Using generalized Ampere's law find the magnetic field in any given point at the xz plane.

Homework Equations



Maxwell-Ampere's law

The Attempt at a Solution



Lost!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
careman said:

Homework Statement



Two equal and opposite charges (± q) start from positions ± y, respectively and move on the y-axis with constant velocity u, so that they approach symmetrically the axis origin. Using generalized Ampere's law find the magnetic field in any given point at the xz plane.

Homework Equations



Maxwell-Ampere's law

The Attempt at a Solution



Lost!
Sorry. You have to show some work. If you can show work, we're allowed to help, and I'd love to do some physics right now, because life is boring right now until 5:00. So, just show how you'd think it would work.
 
A good place to start might be with: what's the generaslized Ampere's law? Note that current density = 0 everywhere on the xz plane.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The displacement current will also be zero? (because from Gauss's law the surface integral of E.dS will be zero?). Therefore the magnetic field is zero?
 
careman said:
The displacement current will also be zero? (because from Gauss's law the surface integral of E.dS will be zero?). Therefore the magnetic field is zero?

Well, D = εE so would you say E = 0 everywhere on the xz plane? And if not, is it time-changing?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Well, yes the electric field is time changing, so I assume I can't use Gauss's law. How can I express the electric field as a function of time?
 
careman said:
Well, yes the electric field is time changing, so I assume I can't use Gauss's law. How can I express the electric field as a function of time?

If the charges were fixed at +/- y could you come up with the field at a point on the xz plane?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If P(x,0,z) is a point on the xz plane, then the electric field on P due to the two charges, would be the vectorial sum of the electric fields due to each charge, i.e.

\vec{E} = \frac{q \hat{r_1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_1^2}+\frac{q \hat{r_2}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_2^2} =<br /> \frac{- q \hat{j}}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}

?
 
careman said:
If P(x,0,z) is a point on the xz plane, then the electric field on P due to the two charges, would be the vectorial sum of the electric fields due to each charge, i.e.

\vec{E} = \frac{q \hat{r_1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_1^2}+\frac{q \hat{r_2}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_2^2} =<br /> \frac{- q \hat{j}}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}

?

Your expression for E in terms of r1 and r2 is OK, but then the addition is not.
As y → 0 the E field at (x,0,z) must go to zero, right?

Express your r1 and r2 vectors in terms of x, y and z. You got the resultant unit vector right, it is j.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top