Applications of Mass Spectrograph

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applications Mass
AI Thread Summary
A mass spectrograph is primarily used to determine the charge-to-mass ratios of ions, specifically for positive ions, and can produce multiple parabolas based on isotopes. The discussion raises the question of whether it can also determine the specific charge of cathode rays, which are composed of electrons. It is clarified that while the mass spectrograph measures charge-to-mass ratios, it cannot provide the specific charge of cathode rays due to the unknown number of electrons involved. The consensus is that the mass spectrograph effectively measures the charge of ions when their mass is known, but not for cathode rays. Overall, the mass spectrograph's utility lies in its ability to analyze ions rather than cathode rays.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# A mass spectrograph determines:
a)spectrum of light
b)charge of the ion
c)specific charge of positive rays
d)specific charge of cathode rays
I know that a mass spectrograph has been used to determine the specific charge of positive ions and we may get 1, 2, 3… Parabola’s depending on the number of isotopes the element under study has. But, can it be used to determine the specific charge of cathode rays?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
# A mass spectrograph determines:
a)spectrum of light
b)charge of the ion
c)specific charge of positive rays
d)specific charge of cathode rays
I know that a mass spectrograph has been used to determine the specific charge of positive ions and we may get 1, 2, 3… Parabola’s depending on the number of isotopes the element under study has. But, can it be used to determine the specific charge of cathode rays?
Cathode rays are electrons. A mass spectrometer measures charge to mass ratios of ions, so c) should be the correct answer. I don't know about the use of the word "rays" though.

AM
 
C is wrong... cathode rays is choice D. I would say B... it doesn't give yuo the specific charge of a cathode ray, because you don't know how many electrons are flowing (it just gives you the relative charge to mass ratio). But the charge of an ion... presumably, you know the mass by looking it up on a periodic table.

To make it a bit clearer (that's rambling up above):

If you use it for a ray, because you don't know how many particles are in the ray, you're only capable of measuring the ratio of charge to mass. However, if you measure the ratio of charge to mass for an ion, you can calculate the charge by figuring out the mass given the composition
 
Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top