Applications of Newton's Laws of Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a toboggan sliding down an 8-degree hill at constant velocity. It emphasizes that the static coefficient of friction can be determined using the angle of the slope, as it relates to the forces acting on the toboggan. Key formulas include the normal force (Fn = Fg cos(angle)) and the force along the slope (Fs = Fg sin(angle)). Participants clarify that the mass of the object does not affect the static coefficient of friction. Overall, the exchange highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between forces and angles in applying Newton's Laws of Motion.
pstfleur
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. A toboggan slides down a hill and has a constant velocity. The angle of the hill is 8.00 with respect to the horizontal. What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the surface of the hill and the toboggan



2. Static Frictional Force, FsMax=msFn



3. I have no freaking idea. All I have is an angle, and the information in the book doesn't give me enough information on the coefficient of kinetic friction. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, don't stress! All you need is the angle. The static coefficient of friction is a ratio of the component of the force along the slope and the component of the force normal to the slope. It is independent of mass of object and material of object and slope.

Consider the force trying to drag the toboggan down the hill. This is from acceleration due to gravity. The normal force (at 90 degrees to the slope) is going to be Fn = Fg cos(angle). The force along the slope is going to be Fs = Fg sin(angle). So when you calculate the static coefficient of friction you have

ms = Fs/Fn where you can substitute in the two formula for Fn and Fs I have written above.
 
Thank you very much.. That really helped me understand the problem.
Geez I love this site
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top